The time has come for the next Assembly to vote on a border poll

In a brave attempt to discuss a border poll dispassionately, Newton Emerson is tentatively suggesting that it might be a good idea to hold a sort of test poll outside the terms of the GFA “to clear the air.” Unfortunately his analysis is better than his prescription, as a poll of any sort  under official sponsorship, even one declared in some way not to count,  would  inevitably still stimulate  the  seven year itch  among nationalists he rightly identifies , to create a countdown  to a united Ireland.

Newton notes the persistent disparity between the political attitude results in the Life and Times surveys and increasingly regular opinion polling. The first thing to do now surely is to convene a study of experts to try to account for this. Explanations are to hand: “ shy nationalists” and sampling which fails to  take adequate account of a communally divided demographic or makes questionable assumptions about  the non-voting public.  Then there is also the example of  the poor predictive record of snapshot polls, whether on line or by telephone,   in the UK and US in volatile political circumstances. As things stand,  a border poll is  kept prominently on the agenda by anyone who has the inclination and funding to commission a public opinion poll. That can’t be right.

What can’t be denied is  that any future result will be closer to the Scottish experience, much more marginal therefore than in the old days of a stable unionist majority. As all recognise,  even the muted DUP, this is due to changing demographics in the North and the transformational  character of the  southern state and its relations with Britain.

The relevant section of the GFA reads to me as if they threw a border poll into the mix as a remote  contingency, almost if not quite as unlikely as the UK leaving the EU.  Leaving the judgement to hold a poll to the secretary of state under the vaguest of criteria  ( Bertie Ahern claims  credit), kept the issue away from the Assembly, in case the existential issue  jeopardised the smooth  operation of  power sharing.

Twenty years on, these criteria should be re-examined.

As the political system institutionalises the communal division, should not the criteria for a border poll do likewise in the form of either a requirement for separate  unionist and nationalist  majorities or an overall weighted majority ?  Almost certainly not. Interestingly  so far there has been no serious agitation for this from unionists  and  it would certainly cause nationalist uproar.  I believe when it comes to it, we are left with the general precedent of 50% +1.

“ When it comes to it.”  There’s the rub. What is the context for a border poll?  All sides are floundering in the Brexit atmosphere, but they would do so even without it. Brexit provides  cover  for a general reluctance  to grip the issue.

How far does “ reconciliation” have to proceed before a border poll is held  and how do we recognise it if and when it happens?  Is  “reconciliation” compatible with a border poll  or a stalling strategy for unionists?

The Unionist parties  are unlikely to engage in scenario  planning for a border poll and more fundamentally  on  terms and conditions for accepting  unity, for fear of encouraging  the very  developments they do not wish to see come about.  The main Dail parties of government are  generally reluctant to engage for fear of jeopardising reconciliation, although they are not above a little constructive ambiguity on the point .

One definitive act that could cut through the thickets of doubt and uncertainty  would be  to call on the northern political parties to declare their position in their manifestoes  on a border poll during the  lifetime of the next Assembly if there is one, and pledge to  vote on it in the Assembly. Anything over a  40%  voter turnout in favour and 40% in the Assembly might be held to be persuasive. But would  not the very proposal be so divisive that it would blight whatever chances there may be after Brexit for reconvening the Assembly?  Or would all parties accept the challenge?

Discover more from Slugger O'Toole

Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.