So then, what sort of Speaker do we want?

Update. It’s now clear Michael Martin will resign his seat.
So Mick quits, in a statement of thundering anti-climax, in less than 100 words before a full House, proving his inadequacy to destruction for the second time in 24 hours. He even left up in the air if he was resigning his Glasgow seat. In the meantime, the arrangements for cleaning -out the stables begin without the slightest idea of what “breaking the rules” means in terms of natural justice, the rules being so vague. Appropriate though that on the Tory side Douglas Hogg, he of the moat cleaning claim, won’t stand again ( althiough he mightn’t have anyway) but I’m glad that Michael Gove one of the best and brightest, has squeaked through. Shahid Malik, cast as the ideal Labourite moderniser is only the first of Labour to crash. There’ll be concerns that Brown and Cameron will bid up the stakes to see who can pose as the better Cromwell. If they’ aren’t very careful, backbenchers may end up even more as cogs of central party machines, which is not what is supposed to happen. Many are furious that Mick mucked up so badly the Speaker’s role as champion ( but not slavish follower) of the backbenches, by opposing FoI for the Commons to the last ditch. The problem is: how can an MP assert his/her independence? The newly introduced secret ballot for electing Michael Martin’s successor should provide an acid test. So then, what sort of new Speaker do we want? MPs are worryingly confused about this. Some talk of “the most powerful Speaker ever” to lead “reform.” Others want a ceremonial figure who has nothing to do with administration. “The embodiment of Parliament to the People and the voice of the people to Parliament” sounds terrific but what does it mean? Mick’s problem was that he fell between the two stools. An interim Speaker up to the election looks like a kite that won’t fly. For those interested, I’ll make my own candidate list later. BTW, there’s no connection whatever between electoral reform and the present crisis. The record of expenses sinning shows the same would have happened under a Conservative government.


Discover more from Slugger O'Toole

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Categories Uncategorised

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.