Medical myths in a time of Covid-19…

One aspect of the Covid19 pandemic is the steep rise in associated myths.    This is not unusual.  In time of crisis we all cling to what we believe and we believe new things more easily;  these certainties give us security and hope.   Indeed, government in its covid19 messaging is itself controlling our behaviour in what I believe to be a more or less responsible manner.    Scaring us into staying home and normalising this behaviour is key to their public health strategy that will assure that the virus finds it very difficult to spread within the population.

Science is most reliable when all the data are known.   In this fast-moving pandemic, it is not possible to know all the data so estimates are made for the models used to extrapolate and from these extrapolations we get best-case and worst-case scenarios which can seem very scary indeed.   Minister Swann announced last week the likelihood of 14,000 deaths in NI while at more or less the same time in ROI Leo Varadkar was quoting 1,000 deaths for his population.  Minister Swann this week revised his mythical figure down to a maximum of 3,000 still high by most models.  Controlling the message in a period of social crisis is clearly very important as the myths created, and the behaviours they stimulate, can be more dangerous than the infection itself.

What is less acceptable are the myths emerging mainly from social media, but also from mainstream media, based on flimsy data and poor science and which cause people to behave in potentially dangerous ways.  These myths have their origins in pseudoscience and stem from abuse of existing scientific data or speculation on half-baked ideas.

Iran has suffered particularly severely from Covid19.   It is also now dealing with a nationwide ethanol poisoning epidemic.  High strength alcohol (ethanol) is widely reported in Iran to be a cure for covid19.   Ironically in a Muslim country where alcohol is off course banned, they had more alcohol deaths than covid19 deaths last week.

Donal Trump in one of his extraordinary – they are never ordinary – press conferences extolled the potential efficacy of the antimalarial drug chloroquine in treating covid19.   Based on this a couple in Arizona overdosed attempting to use the drug prophylactically against the disease with one of them dying.

Less worrying perhaps are the myths that drinking; cow urine, lemon juice and hot water frequently are sure-fire ways of avoiding this viral infection.  It should be noted that these are three separate myths and not the recipe for a pandemic smoothie.

And the myths can get very complex and appear to be plausible science. If we get further data they might be shown to be correct but in the absence of data these are potentially the most pernicious myths.

A few weeks ago Olivier Véran the French Health Minister, who is also a GP, claimed that ibuprofen which pharmacists and GPs were promoting to alleviate symptoms of covid19 may aggravate the infection.

The origin of this was a report from a French doctor who found 4 covid19 deaths where there was no apparent underlying medical cause and the patients were not elderly – one was 20 years of age.   The only common association for these atypical patients was an unspecified use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medicines of which ibuprofen is one.   With a health minister making this claim it has been taken seriously.  Other doctors have commented that anti-inflammatory drugs may dampen the body’s response to infection, slowing recovery.  This is purely speculative and is not supported by evidence.    There was further speculation that ibuprofen causes a process in the body that leads to pneumonia, a severe result of COVID-19 which can lead to death.   Public Health England admitted there is ‘not currently enough information on ibuprofen use and COVID-19’, but that patients should not be put off using it.  The real worry was that this warning extended to cortisone which of course we used to manage asthma. There was a need to tell patients not to stop using their preventor “steroid” inhalers.

Sir Patrick Vallance, the UK chief scientific advisor, when asked about the risk of ibuprofen use in cases of covid19 was blunt saying that there was no evidence ibuprofen aggravated covid19 but then went on to invoke the precautionary principle saying that since paracetamol is available then why risk-taking ibuprofen. Ibuprofen, which was going to be a major symptom treatment for uncomplicated coivd19, was dead.

Another part of this story was more worrying still.   For years there had been speculation that certain drugs used to manage chronic diseases stimulate the production of ACE2 receptors on cells particularly cells lining the nose and throat.  SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes Covid19, appears to enter cells using this receptor.   Myriad drugs increase ACE2 receptors; lisinopril a commonly used antihypertensive drug, some anti-diabetic medicines and anti-inflammatories such as cortisone and ibuprofen.

Looking at excess deaths from China and the association between co-morbidities and death rates it is clear that the “underlying health condition” association is real.  Some are already speculating that this may not be a problem of advanced age and disease in patients succumbing to covid19 but rather a problem of the drugs patients have been taking for years to manage their chronic conditions.  Have people taking these drugs got cells with more ACE2 receptors which are now allowing this, on average not a very dangerous virus, to behave very dangerously indeed?    This is an important question but in the current crisis it risks becoming a myth that may stop people using the medicines essential to their long-term health.  Ironically that would potentially kill many more than this tetchy virus will do over the next few weeks.

Energizing?” by @lattefarsan is licensed under CC BY-SA


Discover more from Slugger O'Toole

Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.