1994 assessment of Peace Dividend – likely to boost jobs in inward investment, export/cross-border trade and tourism, but losses expected in security sector [DED/22/234] #20yearrule

Government papers released on Friday under the 30/20 year rule document a flurry of activity around 1994 as departments tried to put figures on the economic impact of a “sudden cessation of violence” in Northern Ireland.

Against the background of what was described as “the ‘peace’ debate”, file DED/22/234 from the Department of Economic Development (DED) details their broad estimates of the likely effect on employment. While judging that the figures were “highly speculative” – one official supplied what he called a ‘back of envelope’ analysis into the process – they concluded in the autumn of 1994 that “over the longer term, job gains will outweigh job losses”.

An increase in inward investment was predicted to lead to 5-10,000 extra jobs over five years, rising to as many as 26,000 over the decade. A growth in exports and cross-border trade, previously stymied by violence, could create “an additional 2,500-5,00 jobs”. And an increase in tourists could generate 20,000 more jobs.

On the down side, security-related job losses in public and private sectors – some with high salaries but many suspected to offer lower wages – were expected to be in the range of 8,000 immediately, and 17,000 in the longer term.

The CBI estimated a net increase of 20,000 jobs over five year, in line with the DED’s estimates.

DED officials indicated that they would prefer the Secretary of State to “emphasise the positive effects which would come from greater tourism, more inward investment, greater local and international business confidence” rather than talk about “security job losses – much too early to talk of this”.

In 20 years’ time, will we be reading freshly-released government papers documenting departmental views on the Brexit Dividend? [Ed – or will it be in this weekend’s Sunday Times?]

Check out Slugger’s further coverage of the official papers released yesterday.

Discover more from Slugger O'Toole

Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.