Amnesty for security forces foreshadowed in the DUP deal

Just a footnote to yesterday’s post on the government’s floating of an amnesty for security forces.

The Irish News follows up predictably enough with angry responses to what they rightly report as the adoption of the recommendation of the Commons Defence Committee report  just before the general election.

The committee, which includes DUP MP Gavin Robinson, said that the pursuit of members of the crown forces was “wholly oppressive and a denial of natural justice”.

“It can be ended only by a statute of limitations.,”

They repeat the doubtful claim that  an amnesty would correct the imbalance with former paramilitaries.

Under the terms of the Good Friday Agreement, people convicted for pre-1998 offences would serve just two years in jail, but this allowance does not apply to British soldiers or police officers.

Legal authority I quoted  spelled out how there  was no such ineligibility.  It was actually used  after a trial of soldiers in 1998.  There is no loophole to close.  But  it may be that  former soldiers in a and police officers would be reluctant to be tried under the NI Sentences Act in any numbers as it was obviously drafted  for paramilitary use. However if convicted  they could still apply to the Sentences Commissioners for early release.

Outside No 10  Gerry Adams claimed the measure had unilaterally  been included in an amendment to the 2014 Stormont House Agreement by the UK government. The  government spokesman didn’t specifically deny that but said  a consultation had yet to be called.

Strange though  that Adams didn’t make the obvious point, that an eventual amnesty for security forces is foreshadowed in the Conservative – DUP  confidence and supply agreement. Odd that he missed a trick like that.


The UK government will work with the Executive and all parties to seek the implementation of the legacy bodies in the Stormont House Agreement, to provide better outcomes for victims and survivors. The next phase is a public consultation on implementation of the Stormont House Agreement legacy bodies. These are to be established so as to operate in ways that are fair, balanced and proportionate and which do not unfairly focus on former members of the armed forces or police. Both parties reiterate their admiration for the courage and sacrifice of the police and armed forces in upholding democracy and the rule of law and will never forget the debt of gratitude that we owe them.


We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.