“but only those which had a score were recorded in their annual reports…”

This’ll have to you laughing (not)! The poor old PSNI missed more than half their targets says NI’S Comptroller and Auditor General. Then he, rather patiently, explains exactly why

The Policing Board and PSNI have continued to make progress in developing appropriate targets for the Policing Plan, but there is still room for further improvement. In particular, there are too many targets.

A reduction in the number of targets would help to ensure that efforts are clearly focused on improving performance in line with strategic priorities.

But why? As the Bel Tel notes…

The Policing Plan comprised 10 outcomes with 29 performance indicators and 50 associated performance measures.
It was structured around four categories — personal policing, professional policing and protective policing and the overarching objective of increasing confidence.

Both the PSNI and Policing Board are obliged to make the results available to members of the public, but only those which had a score were recorded in their annual reports. Such limited information did not give the reader a proper understanding of the PSNI’s performance against its own targets, the Audit Office said.

Aha. Jonathan Craig, chair of the board’s performance committee, throws some light on the matter

Last year, the board was very keen to set targets for the police. The police have been fighting back and saying there were far too many targets.

The auditor general made it very clear there should be targets. I think that the lack of agreement and research behind the targets that were set has led to this situation where we now find over half of those targets have not been met.

Mr Craig said it looked like some of the targets were not realistic, however he added; “It also looks like some of them were, quite frankly, ignored by the police and not enough effort was made to actually meet those targets.”

Aha. This looks like nother case of political grandstanding on the part of the Policing Board. A few less open ‘grandstanding’ sessions and a few more closed sessions which press hard on what’s actually needed from the cops might help?

Also instructive is the fact that the Board’s annual report was even less open about the missing of targets even than the PSNI’s.


Discover more from Slugger O'Toole

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.