Mick’s post brings out the striking ontrast between this debate in the Dail and how Westminster is currently dealing with Northern Ireland. There is a powerful irony that Dublin is far more interested in our affairs than London, even though London as the paymasters has the overwhelming responsibility.
In NI questions on the same day,Theresa Villiers limited herself to a fatalistic statement of the position on deadlock. Although she has met the parties there have been no serious attempts at persuasion or coaxing, if only to show that London is making the effort.Her line has generally coincided with the DUP’s.
Compared with Scotland or even Wales, attention to NI has been virtually non-existent. Now you might argue that this is shrewd tactics, declining to raise the stakes and staring out Sinn Fein in an attempt to call their bluff. But I doubt it. Sinn Fein may have the stamina to hold out until the elections north and south and allow the drawing on account on the following year’s block grant to build up further.
It remain to be seen whether the UK government will let them. The signs are that they won’t, but there is an air of dream like unreality about the whole business Granted that London has many more fish to fry than Dublin, it’s still a great pity that the UK government have been so passive and non-interventionist for so long. One flurry of a hot- house negotiation in Stormont House last Christmas was clearly not enough. We have been living with that failure for too long. While she can reasonably claim that the stand off is hardly her fault, she remains the representative of the government that is ultimately responsible. Ms Villiers seems to have no aptitude for the sort of person to person contacts that are essential for the job. I can’t imagine very different predecessors from Paddy Mayhew to Mo Mowlan, John Reid and Peter Hain behavingly so passively.