The Psephology of Scotland (2) – Scottish Labour

Start with a few facts:
2007 Constituency results for Scottish Labour – 648,374, 32.2%
2011 Constituency results for Scottish Labour – 630,461, 31.7%
So down 18,000 votes and 0.5%.
2007 Regional List results for Scottish Labour – 595,415, 29.2%
2011 Regional List results for Scottish Labour – 523,559, 26.3%
So down 72,000 and 2.9%
2007 Constituency List differential – (53,000)
2011 Constituency List differential – (107,000)
As a comparison for the SNP:
2007 Constituency List differential – (31,000)
2011 Constituency List differential – (26,000)

Whilst the stagnation of the constituency Labour vote (cf 10.1% gain in Wales) was bad enough the doubling of the differential proved a disaster. Indeed the whole Labour approach toward the regional list vote displayed a strategic and tactical ineptitude of astounding foolishness with astonishing consequences.
To explain:
1) In the Scottish Parliament candidates are allowed to stand both for constituencies and for list seats. Due to historic dominance of FPTP results and a fairly general disdain toward list MPs Scottish Labour in general stood for one or the other – with the most able going for constituencies in general. In contrast SNP big hitters in general would stand for both.
2) The SNP’s message was “Vote for an SNP MSP in your constituency and for Alex Salmond for FM with your second vote”. In contrast Scottish Labour said nothing.
1) Scottish Labour lost a total of 7 seats in the election. However due to 1) above the stronger candidates in the FPTP element did not have an escape route on the lists. Thus Scottish Labour went from 44 seats to 37 seats but due to losing 20 constituencies and gaining 13 on the list the Parliamentary party is dominated by inexperienced newcomers.
2) The differential meant that Labour did not gain more seats in the regional lists to compensate for the constituency losses. If they had just maintained the differential at the 2007 level then another 4 seats (roughly !) would have come their way – perhaps depriving the SNP of a majority.
Data from the BBC and Wiki.

Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger.

While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.