“All of the options have been assessed and that is the optimal solution”

In the weekend section of the Irish Times, Frank McDonald’s article – “No quick fix to bridge the gap” – on the options for the collapsed Broadmeadow viaduct includes this quote from an anonymous “leading structural engineer”

A leading structural engineer, who does not wish to be named, describes the Broadmeadow viaduct as “not dissimilar to most of the national infrastructure we’ve inherited, like all those masonry arch bridges designed for the horse-and-cart era that are still standing today – even under the weight of Glanbia tankers”.

An earlier Frank McDonald article noted the history of the collapsed viaduct. Meanwhile, the main section of the paper reports that a €4 million reconstruction of the viaduct has already begun..

Yesterday, Iarnród Éireann started bringing rock on site to rebuild the eroded weir. The rock will fill the breach, normalise water flows and protect other adjacent piers. The preparatory work will be followed by piling for platforms to allow for the crane required for the reconstruction work. The adjacent piers will be strengthened and beams will be placed across the two spans. “All of the options have been assessed and that is the optimal solution,” said Iarnród Éireann spokesman Barry Kenny.

Optimal? Would that be optimal in the current financial climate?

, , , , ,

  • borderline

    Still no word anywhere of anyone being held to account for this potential catastrophe.

    Brian Cowen should now ask Noel Dempsey, Minister for Transport, for an explanation. If an unconvincing one is forwarded (i.e. one that does not detail what happened, why it happened, who was to blame, who was sacked, and why it won’t happen again) Dempsey should be sacked.

    If Cowen doesn’t do this, Cowen himself should be sacked by the electorate.

    But save for an act of God being the cause, sackings there must be.

  • Hear! hear! borderline @ 01:56 AM!

    It defies all credulity that the engineers of the last re-build are still propagating their success and originality.

    Brunel, most of the time, was able to account for scouring — 160+ years ago. Iarnród Éireann knew that was the problem. So, who was paid-off on this one?