Security chiefs admit lack of preparedness

An interesting piece by Dean Godson , Conservative guru and author of the monumental biography of David Trimble, in this week’s Spectator. The piece seems informed by a high level security briefing, (though he’s under the misapprehension that British welfare payments are higher than the Republic’s). Godson is reluctant to state outright that it was wrong to dismantle so much of the security system – and that applies to the IRA of Adams and Mc Guinness as well, which might have been expected to bear part of the load of neutering the dissidents. Like much recent comment in Slugger, the piece reflects the understandable degree of uncertainty about how big a task lies ahead. No doubt the ultra-pessimists will relish his criticism of Eames/Bradley’s line on informers.GODSON QUOTES
Were too many senior Special Branch officers, especially agent handlers, let go too quickly
under the Patten report of 1999? Is it right that they be left to face the
music before a set of costly inquiries? And were too many informers let go
in the reviews of the early to middle years of this decade? Will any
intelligence officers take the same kind of risks for state security that they
did during the last round of Troubles?

The Joint Intelligence Committee recently discussed whether
this was the start of a major new campaign or the death rattle of
irredentist republicanism and the balance of opinion came down more on
the side of the latter. Senior officials on both sides of the Border reckon
the dissidents might manage a few more attacks, but are still very far from
panicking. Neither the scale of the raids, nor the technology employed, is
yet deemed serious enough to warrant a major reversal of security
?normalisation?.


Discover more from Slugger O'Toole

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Categories Uncategorised

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.