Licensed to kill..?

THE WILL to take on the UVF has been sapped from the top, writes Newton Emerson in yesterday’s Irish News. The UVF, which claims that its feud rival – the LVF – is riddled with informers who are protected by the State, would appear to have a similar issue with protected agents. Some of it is laughably obvious – the block on the publication of the coroner’s report into the murder of David McIlwaine on security grounds, as Emerson writes, is legal code for saying that the killer was a tout. Why indeed has there never been a conviction for the 30 UVF murders carried out since its 1994 ‘ceasefire’?

It would be unfair not to note that there have also been many odd instances of alleged LVF members facing serious charges in court, only for those charges to be mysteriously dropped by the DPP without explanation.

The idea of informers and agents is to garner information to save lives. But because useful informers are sometimes up to their necks in it or career criminals – and yet are protected by the State – it can lead to the situation we have in Belfast today – loyalist Stakeknives.

At what point does the information provided by a covert source no longer outweigh the level of terrorist or criminal activity he is engaged in? What should the State’s response be when a source may be causing more lives to be lost than saved? Is it really in the public interest that the State protects career criminals and multiple murderers?

The spectre of hundreds of UVF supporters recently occupying an east Belfast estate while the PSNI stood and watched – ironically, opposite the police training college – makes you wonder what lesson the post-Patten recruits will really learn about who really runs the streets, and what the Government regards as an acceptable level of loyalist violence and intimidation.

David Ervine recently admitted that the PUP has no power to intervene and stop the loyalist feud. You might think that with no political restraint on the UVF whatsoever, that it might be the right time for the Government to make a move and treat the situation more seriously than it currently is doing. It might well be convenient for some if certain loyalists took a few secrets to their grave, but the problem for the rest of us is that uninvolved people get caught in the crossfire causing families unbearable misery.

Why is the freedom of a UVF serial killer more important to the State than the lives of his 13 victims?

Who exactly is in charge around here?

From yesterday’s Irish News:

Will to prosecute UVF has been sapped from the top
By Eye of Newt

The PSNI is sitting on a bomb and the clock is ticking. Before this year is out the police ombudsman will publish a report into the 1997 murder of Raymond McCord jnr. The initial findings, which were widely leaked two years ago, suggest that an informer in the Mount Vernon UVF has murdered at least 13 people since his recruitment in 1993. Special Branch is alleged to have covered up each case. The list of victims is mostly Protestant but includes the all too familiar roll-call of randomly selected Catholics plus the clearly psychotic butchering of Portadown teenagers Andrew Robb and David McIlwaine. When the report breaks the fall-out will be spectacular. British Irish Rights Watch, which has already presented its own confidential findings to the American, British and Irish governments, says the case is: “As bad as it gets.”

At least one more high-ranking UVF informer is likely to be exposed but the harshest glare will fall on those in authority who have humoured the phantom of political loyalism without any regard for human life. This is another all too familiar roll-call.

Successive secretaries of state and security ministers – up to and including the present incumbents – have persistently refused to review the UVF ‘ceasefire’ despite 30 murders since 1994. Nobody has been convicted for any of those murders, making it absurdly obvious that both the police and the Prosecution Service are under political instruction.

The Northern Ireland Office refused extra funding for the ombudsman’s inquiry, delaying it by two years, during which eight of the 30 murders were committed.

The additional funding requested was £5 million – roughly what the children’s commissioner has cost over the same period. The chief constable blocked publication of the coroner’s report into the murder of David McIlwaine on security grounds, a move that can only have been made to protect an informer. Everyone involved in these decisions will shortly have to explain them in terms of a preventable death toll exceeding that of the Omagh bomb. It is perfectly possible to justify the use of dangerous informers and it is far too easy to criticise the horrendous compromises necessary when only evil people can provide good information. Shortly after his recruitment the Mount Vernon informer is thought to have led police to a UVF weapons dump and doubtless supplied further useful intelligence. Might he have saved lives overall? Former Special Branch detective Johnston Brown – who put Johnny Adair away only to see Mo Mowlam release him – definitely doesn’t think so.

Speaking about the case on UTV two years ago, Mr Brown said: “Could we have put the majority of the Mount Vernon UVF in jail in 1997, 1998, 1999? Absolutely. Lives would have been saved time and time again. There appeared to be no will to prosecute certain individuals.”

Given the attempts at every level to frustrate Nuala O’Loan’s inquiry it seems that the will to prosecute the UVF has been sapped from the top.

The great and the good of amoral peace processing – Number 10 policy advisor Jonathan Powell springs especially to mind – remain determined to pursue identical policies towards republicans and loyalists although it has been plain for years that loyalists are not responding.

No doubt Number 10 blames working-class Protestants for not supporting David Ervine as instructed. No doubt too this makes the predominantly working class Protestant body count easier to bear. But only for a little while longer. As the UVF runs increasingly amok every unpunished outrage will only serve to underscore that looming report. Excuses that never washed in the first place will finally be hung out to dry.

What are informers for if their information is never used?

Why are prosecutions withheld for lack of evidence when informers can turn Queen’s evidence – and the law was changed after Omagh to make a senior police officer’s testimony sufficient evidence regardless?

How many loyalist murders did the NIO think were worth one loyalist MLA?

Was it more than 30, perhaps?

How many loyalist murders did it think were worth a two-year breather?

More than eight, apparently.

As the convenient flag of the Mount Vernon UVF now rises above the typically elusive killers of 15-year-old Thomas Devlin, the smell of fudge again pervades the air.

Hugh Orde, Peter Hain and Jonathan Powell need to wake up and smell the coffee.

They have less than three months to put the UVF out of business – before the UVF puts them out of business.


Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger.

While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.