UUP: winner takes all contest?

David Trimble’s former press secretary, Martin McNeely, has warned that although he regards the party leader as head and shouldrs above any of his rivals, his real failure to date has been his inability to impose party discipline and drive through the necessary changes to what he calls “an old-style political club”.

He’s worth quoting more fully, because his views are close to a wider feeling within the pro Agreement Unionist camp:

Whilst David Trimble is very good at addressing the wider picture, he needs to heed grassroots concerns. He needs to tap into sceptical concerns in language that anti-Agreement unionists understand. I think this is now an almost impossible task because there is so much enmity in the party. In PR terms, being perceived as ‘pro-Agreement’ is another difficult issue.

Despite inward investment, relative stability and consumer confidence on the High Street, the UUP has failed to capitalise on the feel-good factor some time ago. Other players in the process have let Trimble down badly, but the average unionist has lost faith. It will be very difficult to recover from that. One of the other issues which needed to be addressed, was internal party strategy and organisation.

Interestingly, there is little personal animosity towards Jeffrey Donaldson, but McNeely is sceptical that the anti-Agreement wing will be willing to engage in any compromise to allow them to work with pro-Agreement unionists – a winner takes all scenario.


Discover more from Slugger O'Toole

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.