The wee parties won’t weigh in the Westminster balance

Dewi will disagree but there’s an air of unreality about the Nat’s bargaining position. For one thing they’d have to do extraordinarily well and the Lib Dems really badly to hold the balance in a hung ( or as they prefer “ balanced” Parliament. For another, as my colleague Alan Trench analyses trenchantly ( sorry) in his authoritative blog Devolution Matters, there’s little to attract either the Conservatives or Labour about their terms. I will give Dewi one point. After comments in a post so far back I can’t find it about the leaders’ TV debates, Alex Salmond’s second idea of a fourth leader’s debate featuring the SNP and Plaid leaders along with the others, with devolution as a main theme, is a good one. But too late now! Meanwhile the whole Ucunf thing is on another planet.
What the Conservatives failed to realise is that what’s left of the UUP, like the DUP is essentially an Ulster first party, more like a nationalist party and not an integrationist one and never really was. Watchman’s critique is pretty sharp.

Alan Trench extrs
The key agreed demands are:
1. Fair funding for Wales and Scotland
2. Protecting local services and the most vulnerable
3. Action to help the green economy
4. Support for business growth
But there’s a distinct air of unreality about them….

… ‘fair funding’ is hugely difficult. It really means ‘no cuts’; but the effect of that is very different in each nation. Wales is, so far as we can tell, slightly under-funded compared with England; Scotland, significantly over-funded…

But this is not ‘fair’ funding, if what you mean is ‘fair to all people in the UK, regardless of where they live’. In the likely climate for public spending, calling for ‘no cuts’ is not very realistic either. Earlier SNP statements, such as Alex Salmond’s speech to the SNP party conference last October, that they would use their position in a hung Parliament to secure financial advantages for Scotland, were actually quite reasonable – what they were seeking were things that Scotland should have received had the finance system in fact worked properly. These demands aren’t like that.


Discover more from Slugger O'Toole

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Categories Uncategorised

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.