John Bercow: What should a 21st century Parliament look like?

The Speaker of the House of Commons was omni-present on the last day of the Political Studies Association conference. After a morning session with NICVA, a post lunchtime session on engagement and impact, he wrapped up the conference by delivering the closing lecture.

School children studying politics packed the room, more than making up for conference delegates who had left for early flights.

In asking “what should a 21st century Parliament look like?“, John Bercow said that it needed to represent 21st century democracy and went on to define what a ‘dynamic democracy’ would look like.

  • If parliaments are to be as consequential in the present and the future as at their best they have been in the past, then their internal balance between their chamber and their committees will need to become more flexible.
  • A truly modern parliament will need to engage in constant internal innovation and be much more accessible externally.
  • Legislatures are much more likely to achieve this desirable state of affairs if they pay more attention than in the past to what other parliamentary bodies are doing. The case for a really internationalist mindset has never been stronger.

In the course of his speech, John Bercow praised the resource of the Parliament website and BBC Democracy Live, and spoke about outreach work as well as plans for an education centre that will allow thousands of children to experience their parliament in London.

After the lecture, John Bercow took questions from children in the audience, including one that asked whether the fact that swing voters in swing seats had most influence at election was a failure of democracy. He answered deftly, saying that there needed to be a means to decide polls, that the current first past the post system usually produced clear majority governments, and that the AV debate had been held and lost. He went on to point out that MPs do not just server those who voted for the, but should help everyone equally. He also fielded a question about alternative decision-making methods for multi-option issues.

No doubt over the weeks and months ahead, political scientists and parliamentarians will want to pour over his message and analyse the impact of putting it into practice. Feel free to record your comments and reactions below!


Discover more from Slugger O'Toole

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.