NI’s £400m Asylum Housing Bill Raises Questions Over Who’s Profiting…

From the BBC:

The estimated costs of accommodation for asylum seekers in Northern Ireland has risen to £400m, four times the original estimate. That is according to a report by the UK Spending watchdog, the National Audit Office (NAO). According to the NAO, there were 2,741 people in asylum accommodation in Northern Ireland in December 2024. That included 413 people in hotels and 2,328 people in other accommodation. According to the NAO, asylum accommodation in Northern Ireland is among the most profitable in the UK, with a profit margin of 15% for the supplier. The NAO says that in total the three companies made a combined profit of £383m on asylum accommodation contracts between September 2019 and August 2024.

If you think that seems quite a lot of money for only a few thousand people, you would be right. As we discovered with COVID and the PPE scandal, there is no shortage of people looking to profit from other people’s misery.

There is a solution the government continues to ignore. From the same article:

Liz Griffith, from the Migration Justice Project at Law Centre NI, said that, while the cost of supporting asylum seekers is “expensive”, the cost is a “political choice”. “It’s not good public policy to prevent people from working,” she added. Ms Griffith said the government should offer more of the visas that are available to those fleeing Ukraine, where the current rules mean they can apply for visas , externalwhich allow them to work in the United Kingdom. Successful applicants are able to live, work and study in the UK and access public funds. Usually, those who claim asylum in the UK are not allowed to work whilst their claim is being considered, external. “If the government wants to save money, it should grant asylum seekers the right to work, as research shows that this would save the government £4.4bn.” She said such a law change would mean that asylum seekers would also be able to make a contribution to the national Gross Domestic Product (GDP). “Most importantly, it would restore dignity amongst those people currently waiting for a decision,” she added.

When you have a skills shortage, preventing thousands of willing workers from actually working seems morally and economically wrong.


Discover more from Slugger O'Toole

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.