Sinn Féin’s Operation Delete Tweets goes into overdrive (under cover of a media blackout)…

For those who are sceptical of my argument that there is a Sinn Fein shaped hole in our political media coverage, you’d need to take a magnifying glass to find reference to the unsavoury tweets from three SF MLAs revealed in detail on Nolan yesterday.

There’s a story in the Bel Tel about Doug Beattie needing help (and we will continue to look at how those tweets may continue to affect his prospects as a leader of the Ulster Unionists), but by and large the press took the view that a SF apology is enough.

And that despite the fact whilst the Twitter accounts of the three miscreant women are being forensically cleaned, as might have been advisable before they were co-opted as MLAs, at least two of their sitting MPs have also had their accounts taken off line.

Sitting MPs Michelle Gildernew (a public rep when Twitter began) and Chris Hazard have also had their accounts taken off line last night, presumably for a scrubbing of historical data. Yet, not a peep in the MSM. So when is a tweet controversial in NI?

The lack of balance here is almost as comical as it is concerning. And, by the way, it’s not the systemic unfairness to unionism that matters. In the long term it may be to their benefit that such odd refractories get brought to the surface and are dealt with.

In just the same way, a convenient blind eye may prove inimical in that disappearance of inconvenient ‘mistakes’ from the record may damage the ambitions of their beneficiaries. Journalism’s gift to democracy is to show politicians their weaknesses.

All the better to fix their faults. After all you cannot fix what you (or your voters) don’t know about.

Featured illustration via Am Ghobsmacht.


Discover more from Slugger O'Toole

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.