Demand for legal access to medical cannabis is pushing the debate ahead….

Pearse Donnelly, a musician, activist and medical cannabis patient. Regional co-Chair for United Patients Alliance here demonstrates how Cannabis debate is taking off even in politically becalmed Northern Ireland .

Two decades in and almost forty weeks into Stormont’s mobocracy, cannabis becomes a unifying force between all major parties in Northern Ireland. All while our nomadic First and deputy First Ministers quibble at an ill-fated Conservative Conference.

The representatives in support of this fresh controversy would surely that agree our hearts were taken by young Castlederg warrior, Billy Caldwell. Battling intractable epilepsy, Billy took refuge not only in California, USA but in cannabis.

Discovering an unlikely medicine and remarkable recovery was the result of a mother’s unyielding effort to save her child’s life.
He holds the first NHS prescription for cannabis oil.

Without Billy and the children like him (Ava Barry, Sophia Gibson, Deryn Blackwell and Tristan Calahane, to name just a few), the true stories of cannabis medicine may have been consigned to oblivion.

The urgent need to address policy in our region is undeniable.

Strong, independent mothers, seeking nothing more than the effective treatment of their desperately sick children, are being unwittingly – and unfairly – plunged into myriad engaged and developed environments; the media circus, international health and legal officials and the underworld of Europe’s – oft-times jittery – cannabis community.

Paramount to all, twenty-four hour care for a vulnerable child. A collection of tasks not one of which the bravest among us would tackle, unless we must. All while being subject to scrutiny from people who have not walked an inch in their shoes.

Presenting as emotional a conversation as they do, do not be fooled, these mothers (and activists, as they in fact are?) do not fall short of experience or knowledge.

With the subject of cannabis-based medicines being as consistently measured as it is, the information is here. The scientific argument is won. The debate is over.

Doctors in developed countries are treating children from the UK and Ireland freely with a full spectrum and various combinations of all cannabinoids and related compounds.

Not only these children but in some cases their families become what the community refer to as, ‘Cannabis Refugees’. What is currently being demanded of the establishment is to allow cannabis as a medicine so that people can access it at home.

How did Northern Ireland develop a public relationship with cannabis?

In an age of information, ignorance is a choice. It is being demonstrated to us on a global scale; medical cannabis regulation is safer and beneficial. The activity of recreational users, however, cannot be ignored.

Access to illicit materials is limited to the unknowing and the risk is greater if there isn’t a seasoned intermediary willing to share the burden. This has been happening for a long time.

Activist groups, social clubs, compassion clubs and online social communities at this stage cannot be ignored. They have established themselves as a viable cornerstone for an emerging market and supporting industries.

Introducing United Patients Alliance: much like Labour MP Paul Flynn they stand in defence of legal cannabis. UPA back his 117th and upcoming call in Parliament to allow legal access to medical cannabis.

Having been vocal in the media in recent years and working with Professors Mike Barnes and David Nutt, Baroness Molly Meacher, Paul Flynn, Tonia Antoniazzi MP, the APPG for Drug Reform, gaining trustees and patrons to their board of directors in these very people, United Patients Alliance have struck a deserved role in becoming a nationally-recognised lobby group for Parliament.

In recent years we could not deny the efforts of Northern Ireland’s first cannabis legalisation party. Consider this a tipping point. Bear witness: the political arena is engaged. The momentum to follow was not the Trojan Horse that the government thought it would be.

Instead, children, mothers, entire families, doctors, legal professionals, activists and even politicians are all singing from the same hymn sheet; we demand legal access to medical cannabis.

Thankfully due to his treatment, Billy has been seizure-free for almost three hundred days. Only over a year ago he was subject to up to one hundred seizures per day.

He and his mother Charlotte will be attending a public display at Stormont Parliament Buildings on Tuesday, 10th October at 12pm. ‘Patients at Stormont’ will be a unique public gathering of patients who use cannabis as a medicine, together to make a plea to a keen group of attentive officials.

There are multiple members of our Assembly, from each major party (even the staunchest of former opponents) who have agreed with the organisers and Charlotte to attend on the day to support the cause, which was originated by Gareth Tuff and United Patients Alliance as a mirror event to ‘Patients At Parliament’.

It will not only support Labour and Paul Flynn’s call to legalise medical cannabis, it will demonstrate the need for rapid change in legislation, further discussions and ultimately give all patients from the island another opportunity to speak where it matters most.


  • Stuart Reece

    I disagree with Peter Reynolds.

    1) Reynold’s comments about Pamela McColl are false and unashamedly and overtly defamatory.

    2) Reynold’s comments about clinical trials are also misleading. Dr Nora Volkow, Director of the National Institute of Drug Abuse recently advised that there are 139 clinical trials of THC and / or CBD registered on, irrespective of all the other clinical trials registries globally. After all of that investigation the only positive output we have to date is a single trial in a few dozen epileptic children which showed a positive effect. Any other drug would have been abandoned long ago.

    3) 139 clinical trials implies that there is a good statistical chance that 28 of those trials will prove positive just by chance. This is so over-tested that one will have to be very cautious even a clinical trials do produce apparently positive effects.

    4) Meanwhile in most of the trials where results are accessible most of the patients experienced very high rates of significant deleterious side effects. If this were a rational debate discussion of medical cannabis would have been abandoned long ago.

    5) It is a matter of record that everywhere medical cannabis has gone it is little more than the “Trojan Horse” for full decriminalization – first of weed, soon to be followed by the other addictive drugs. Cannabis is only “medical” till it gets its “snout under the tent flap” then the whole mess quickly follows along behind.

    6) Why are we not discussing the cannabis slums of Colorado which have sprung up since decriminalization??

    7) Why are we not discussing the many psychotic and long term mentally ill patients who now inhabit those parts of Los Angeles where weed use was common??

    8) Why are we not discussing the link between violent crime and both cannabis intoxication and withdrawal?? By violent crime I include American style shoot-ups in schools and the mass attacks such as the Boston bombing.

    9) This debate seems to be about ideology and cash. Why are the bills for the psychosis induced amongst the new 500,000 American cannabis addicts documented in the recent JAMA Psychiatry report by New York’s Mailman School of Public Health and also not being sent to all the cannabis billionaires which appear to be springing up everywhere cannabis becomes legal??

    10) Why are we not seeing class actions against cannabis billionaires from the victims’ families for cannabis related mass violence???

    11) The US Centres for Disease Control has stated many times that they are very concerned about the links between cannabis exposure and deformed babies. I would be very grateful if someone could show me just one reference in the propagandist cannabis legalization literature which reflects this concern.

    12) Does the cannabis industry pay public liability insurance?? What is the success rate of the claims against them??

    13) Which insurers are insuring the cannabis industry for their public liability insurance? Where are their insurer’s getting their medical and legal advice from? Have those insurers ever read any of the medical literature relating to the effects of cannabis???

    14) Peter Reynolds is a well-known advocate of cannabis, and a cannabis entrepreneur. He thus has a profound and obvious personal conflict of interest in the blatant propaganda around cannabis. Please explain why he is not disqualified on this basis from writing any report for a learned professional college??

    15) As Pamela McColl correctly states that scientific literature is full of warnings relating to cannabis at many levels: including psychiatric, molecular, genetic, immunological, epidemiological, cell signalling and reproductive literatures. Please explain why the public discourse is so skewed?? The public statements on cannabis too often read like a hard core propagandist marketing campaign for a global green scourge. This in turn implies that the cannabis industry is on a collision course with reality – a train wreck which they imagine the general community will pay for.

    16) Peter Reynolds references his arguments to Wikipedia????

    17) Reynolds references his arguments to one of the major global cannabis pharmaceutical companies???

  • Lucas West

    Here is my story. greatful

    My wife was diagnosed with a cancer, ( before i learnt of Rick Simpsons oil

    / RSO ) the hospital said to do chemotherapy and radiotherapy.. she did..

    and went through a lot.. but no cure, after a while the doctors said the

    cancer was spreading and we could look for alternatives.. i searched the

    internet and found out about the oil.. asked alot of questions.. watched

    the videos etc.. we made the oil our selves but it couldn’t just work out

    we were doing more harm than good and the cancer was still there spreading,

    i searched more on the internet i found a testimony on how a lady got the

    oil via an email,

    immediately copied the email: i wrote to this very email and in an hour later i

    got a reply back asking me some few questions, and enlightened me on how to

    get the oil in the next 48hours, i placed my order and in the next 48hours

    the medication oil got to us. immediately my wife started using the oil, it

    been two months now, since my wife has been using the medication oil and

    the cancerous problems are gone this very fact was clarified by the doctor.

    i put up this piece of testimony for the sake of those once who need this

    oil to please don’t die in silence their is a cure for your cancer today

    email: and get the oil……..