“the UK does not want to see border posts for any purpose…”

Quickly, here’s a resume of Theresa May’s piece in the Irish News today:

On the citizenship rights guaranteed by the Belfast Agreement, our position is clear. Northern Ireland remains an integral part of the United Kingdom, but it is also the permanent birthright of the people of Northern Ireland to hold both British and Irish citizenship.

And…

We also want the EU funding that has helped victims of the Troubles and cross-community groups to continue at least until the current programme finishes. We then want to go further, and explore a potential future programme of peace funding after we leave the EU.

Then on free movement for British and Irish citizens:

For those concerned about freedom of movement across Northern Ireland and Ireland, our proposal is clear: we want to maintain the reciprocal arrangements for the Common Travel Area and all the rights for our citizens that have existed in some form since 1922.

It allows British and Irish people to move freely across our islands, and is at the core of the deep social, cultural and economic ties that link us together.

It goes beyond just the ability to move between our islands without passport controls, and also means guaranteeing continuing rights for UK and Irish nationals to work and access public services.

On the border:

 …there should be no physical border infrastructure of any kind on either side of the border between Northern Ireland and Ireland. I want people to be absolutely clear: the UK does not want to see border posts for any purpose.

Economics…

…preserving North-South and East-West cooperation, and making sure the all-Ireland energy market is protected. All of this work only underlines the importance of getting the Northern Ireland Executive back up and running. That is an urgent goal for me and Secretary of State James Brokenshire. And it is one the Irish Government shares.

Then it’s a rinse and repeat to the finish…

  • Roger

    Your “If” and references to “identity” are a bit dull. The discussion has at all times been about citizenship, a legal status. You know that. You acknowledged this in your second reply, a whiles back. Remember? There’s no ambiguity.

    “She cannot escape her UK citizenship unless she formally renounces it.” Agreed. Of course, to renounce it, she’d have to acknowledge that she has it. That is something she rejects.

  • Devil Éire

    Your “If” and references to “identity” are a bit dull. The discussion has at all times been about citizenship, a legal status.

    Yes, it is tedious, and I agree that you clarified that the discussion was about citizenship early on, but whenever you claim that I agree with a statement like ‘But British she is. Whatever else she may be., I find it necessary to state my position more precisely. If only for anyone who might read your claim out of context.