“No politician, nor any relative of any politician in Northern Ireland, was ever to receive any monies in any way”

So after the utter feverishness of last week, which finished with a flat denial by the First Minister, Ian Coulter speaks pretty plainly about the Project Eagle deal…

The concept of a Northern Ireland NAMA deal was developed and significant work leading up to this deal was done by other business people in Northern Ireland, before any involvement of Cerberus (or any bidder).  None of these other parties were from Tughans and none were politicians or relatives of politicians.

Through Tughans I was formally engaged to provide the required local counsel to Brown Rudnick.   This was a commercial arrangement with Brown Rudnick, for which fees were discussed and agreed.

No politician, nor any relative of any politician in Northern Ireland, was ever to receive any monies in any way as part of this deal.  This was never discussed, assumed nor expected.

The deal itself was a straightforward one between a buyer (Cerberus) and a seller. NAMA received what it has publicly confirmed is the full and disclosed value.

No monies from NAMA went towards any fees paid to Tughans.  The money which has been called into question was part of the total legal and consultancy fees agreed as payable by Cerberus to Brown Rudnick.  Cerberus did not engage or pay Tughans directly.  Cerberus has acted completely professionally and properly at all times in relation to this matter.

The fees payable were paid into a Tughans company account supervised by the firm’s Finance team.  In September 2014, a portion of the fees was retained by Tughans and I instructed Tughans’ Finance Director to transfer the remaining portion into an external account which was controlled only by me.  Not a penny of this money was touched.

The reason for the transfer is a complex, commercially- and legally-sensitive issue and has been explained to my former partners at Tughans. It will be explained to the appropriate authorities and those entitled to that information as part of my continuing co-operation with any investigation.

The money which was transferred to an external account was not “discovered” or “retrieved” by the Law Society or Tughans during an audit, as some reports have incorrectly stated.  In fact, I transferred the money back to Tughans in early December 2014 and I brought this to their attention.

From late November until early January, discussions took place to try to resolve the matter. In January 2015 these discussions broke down and I decided to resign from Tughans.  Terms and conditions for my resignation were agreed between me and Tughans.   

I have not received any personal financial benefit for my work on this transaction.  Neither I nor any third party has received any part of the £7.5million fees.

Alongside the press statement itself, comes this note to editors, which provides a public interest argument for offloading all of Nama’s Northern Ireland assets in one lot, the very thing that NAMA’s critics in the south remain critical of…

…the sale of the NAMA NI property portfolio was an important and significant deal for the NI economy.  If such a deal had not taken place, the inevitable NAMA enforcement process posed a significant risk to a wide and diverse section of the business community and the whole Northern Ireland economy. 

A significant number of local companies and business people were caught up in NAMA and could not move forward with their businesses until their debt problems were resolved.  A large number of employers would have faced bankruptcy as a very likely prospect and this would have created a further real risk to job creation.

Encouraging any recovery in the NI property and construction sectors depended in part on obtaining a release of the NI assets and debt from NAMA so that local business people could negotiate with a more commercially willing, less constrained body than NAMA.

That’s pretty much everything he has released. It comes with an assertion that after this we won’t be hearing anything more from Mr Coulter until all the various investigations are completed.

What he does say, he says pretty clearly and unequivocally. But there are some interesting gaps.

He doesn’t explain, for instance, why the money was resting in that Isle of Man account just from September to December 2014.  Nor does he say that he will explain it other than to those he deems necessary.

There are other gaps in the narrative. In contrast to Coulter’s statement, it was Tughans themselves who have said that they had ‘discovered’ the money in that account and subsequently ‘retrieved’ it.

It’s also interesting to note that “Mr Coulter has not been asked to attend either the Finance Committee of the Northern Ireland Assembly or the Public Accounts Committee of the Oireachtas.” Which is curious, to say the least.

There was some speculation at the weekend that Mick Wallace is preparing to again use parliamentary privilege to make further statements on the matter this week.

Mick is founding editor of Slugger. He has written papers on the impacts of the Internet on politics and the wider media and is a regular guest and speaking events across Ireland, the UK and Europe. Twitter: @MickFealty