The Election: What Scottish Labour Should Do Next (But Probably Won’t)

Post-election narratives don’t come much bigger than a party left staring into its very soul. Questions over leadership, policy, engagement with the electorate – this is how the debris of defeat is supposed to resemble. But to be so comprehensively outflanked by a party that – independence aside – occupies a similar wavelength of the political spectrum? Ouch.

For Scottish Labour must be hurting right now. Watching as your share of vote tumbles from 42% to a shade over 24% in successive General Elections – bye-bye, 40 of 41 seats – is nothing if not a bat up the collective nightdress.

Yet even more worrying from the party’s perspective is the genuine prospect that this may not be a mere blip in that long-standing “Labour heartlands” narrative, but a complete recalibration of where the left-of-centre momentum will be sitting for the next five, ten, whatever years. The SNP may have given Labour the bloodiest of bloody noses this time around, but without some wit, guile and imagination, there’s little to suggest that this won’t become a pattern.

Far be it for me to run Scottish Labour’s election post-mortem for them; indeed there’s already debate amongst senior politicians over and above the noise generated by the Parliamentary Labour Party in Westminster, and the forthcoming meeting of the Scottish Executive Committee may see a shift in the leadership. Still, even from the outside, there’s some obvious pointers as to how Scottish Labour can at least begin to reassert itself within Caledonian politics; items its very future as viable mechanism may depend on.

In the short term, it’s obvious; Jettison Jim Murphy. Wangle him in a seat in the Lords. Tell him that he’s done a sterling job as Scottish Leader, and that as a reward he’s being promoted to head up the Easter Island branch. Tow him into the Firth of Forth for use as target practice… it doesn’t really matter how the Executive chooses to do it, just as long as he’s never seen or heard in Scotland again. For Murphy is the epitome of the toxic brand, perceived to be duplicitous, charmless, politically narcissistic and little more than a Westminster stooge. When SNP-supporting wags have launched an online petition pleading with you to stay, it’s probably time to engineer an exit.

However, swapping Murphy for a Kezia Dugdale (or whoever) is an empty gesture without a fundamental shift in both strategy and purpose.

De-coupling from the Westminster party is a must, the austerity debate just the latest example of an SNP gifted initiative by Scottish Labour’s lack of autonomy. You can’t present the electorate with a coherent narrative when the big bosses down in London hold a veto, and as Johann Lamont implied when quitting as leader in 2014, UK Labour’s interference is not limited to policy. To be effective, Scottish Labour needs to serve as sister organisation rather than branch office, taking the Westminster whip on UK issues, but gaining the manoeuvrability to address the very different Scottish agenda on its own terms.

For far too long, Labour has fostered a top-down, paternalistic relationship with the Scottish electorate – which may have been fine and dandy back in 1962, but as the SNP’s Holyrood powerbase demonstrates, isn’t an option in a political climate driven by local activism and engagement – for indeed it’s this that has proved a keystone of nationalist success. Only a Scottish party (and not a UK body with local branding) can begin to rebuild its support, using Holyrood as its aperture; only then can they begin to undercut SNP support on socio-economic issues, and face that pernicious independence question head-on.

UK Labour may have been the architects of devolution, but there’s always been a suspicion that their reflexive unionism has tempered enthusiasm for a federalist solution. And yet devo-max offers the perfect opportunity not only to see off independence at the pass; by proactively advocating a fully devolved future, buttressed by economic solutions the pro-indy alliance never satisfactorily answered, Scottish Labour can be at the heart of a truly progressive, pro-Scotland movement.

Traditionalists may not find reinvention easy, and for us neutrals at least, the months ahead will be fascinating. However, there is one thing that needs to cease immediately; stop inviting English politicians/celebrities to prowl the streets of Glasgow, telling Scots how to vote. The Indyref lesson – hordes of Labour grandees emerging from Central station, only to be hailed with the Imperial Death March and “Welcome to our Imperial Overlords – can’t really said to have been learned when Jim Murphy’s secret election weapon turns out to be Eddie Izzard in St Enoch Square, rocking the primary school headmistress on verge of retirement look amidst waves of heckling. If nothing else it’s patronising as hell, and if the recent SNP has demonstrated anything, it’s that Scotland is sick of being patronised.

Duncan Harman is a new Glasgow based writer on Slugger. We welcome him to the site. He can be found on twitter @lazerguidedblog

Discover more from Slugger O'Toole

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.