11th Night Bonfires, Trickledown & 2 Corinthians 6:17

As all strands of political unionism and loyalist paramilitarism assembled in an east Belfast Orange Hall to sign a new PUL covenant yesterday, it is worth reminding ourselves of the pertinent facts.

The political leadership of unionism, from the DUP First Minister, Peter Robinson, to the UDA and UVF-aligned political representatives and the anti-Agreement TUV leader, Jim Allister, have united as one to endorse a programme of ‘graduated’ action intended on raising communal tensions and putting the shared political institutions at risk because a UVF-aligned loyalist band (with Combat 18 sympathisers) and Orangemen can not march through a Catholic area in Belfast’s most sensitive sectarian interface twice in one day.

As a statement of where Unionism stands in 2014, it requires no elaboration.

Meanwhile, the trickledown from the supremacist agenda is visible on the pyres that will today be adorned with more of the sickeningly sectarian and racist banners and items that have formed an integral part of the 11th/12th celebrations.

On this note, yesterday’s Belfast Telegraph led with the reappearance of a statue to the Virgin Mary on the Lanark Way bonfire in north Belfast, the third year a religious statue has been placed on this bonfire (it’s traditional!) It was stolen from a shrine dedicated to a victim of suicide (lest we forget, loyalists in north Belfast have form in mocking Catholic victims of suicide from bonfires.)

In Limavady, a Kill All Taigs (KAT) banner was helpfully placed on a bonfire in case the message from the appearance of election posters was not clear enough. And, from east Belfast to Armagh, the Papal flag proudly flutters alongside the Irish Tricolour to further drive home to the assembled the true face of the enemy.

Newtownabbey loyalists included a swastika on a banner proclaiming ‘Culture not Cash,’ an inconvenient nod to the fusion of racism and sectarianism further exposed by the proliferation of yellow posters to the hated Chinese woman, Anna Lo, peppering bonfires in a break from a not so proud tradition  in which posters of the traditional Other alone took pride of place on the bonfires.

Unionism’s graduated response is but the latest effort to return Ulster to a distant past, where the beat of the Orange Drum kept order in a society affording a superior place to Britishness in all its local manifestations- a Britishness rejected by the British of Britain, as illustrated by Prime Minister Cameron’s carefully delivered uppercut to Gregory Campbell in the House of Commons this week.

Over on EamonMallie.com, Colm Dore’s piece on Unionism and Modernity is worth reading:

Unionism was founded on, and remains dominated by, fear of the Other, inextricably linked with regard of the Other as inferior. That is incompatible with modern discourse, and, by ‘modern’, I largely mean Enlightenment ideas, hardly cutting edge stuff.

‘Triangulation’ was the term used to describe Bill Clinton putting the GOP on a reactionary back-foot by his repositioning. It is the effect that Sinn Fein’s mere presence in democratic politics has on Unionism. Hence Jim Molyneaux’s fear that the IRA ceasefire was destabilising. It revealed Unionism’s true opponent; not Sinn Fein, but having to deal with nationalists as equals, i.e. modernity.

‘Pastor-gate’ was a side-bar in this difficulty with modernity in substance and tone. Northern Ireland’s main party of government has had problems with homophobia (Sammy Wilson, in Jim Davidson mode, called homosexuals “poofs”) and misogyny (e.g. toward the Women’s Coalition). The party’s disproportionate number of Creationists is, relatively, benign.

The fear manifests in the constant wariness for Lundys, making leadership nigh impossible for fear of being outflanked by traditional voices. Hence un-elected Orangeman Mervyn Gibson’s inclusion in the DUP Haas-talks team, and the need, at those negotiations, to brief Jamie Bryson and Willie Frazer.

It creates McCarthyite anti-intellectualism, dismissing intellectually and culturally expansive unionists like Brian John Spencer as Lundys, inauthentic ‘snobs’ liable to treacherously open the gates of insularity. Jamie Bryson likens them to Nazi collaborators.

It results in incredible (in both senses of that word) double standards: Unionist Exceptionalism, which is logical given the pre-modern sense of superiority to the Other. Why be subject to the same rules? Hence the à la carte attitude to the rule of law e.g. on parades, and toleration of sectarian songs, bonfires, and sectarian use of flags to claim territory. Camp Twaddell is allowed to illegally squat on Housing Executive land, while the Minister responsible, Nelson McCausland, shares the platform, applauding antediluvian rants. Hence the black-and-white Troubles narrative of IRA sole responsibility in denial of Unionist and state wrong-doing (viz. Gregory Campbell’s bitter contortions in TV interviews on the day of Cameron’s Bloody Sunday apology).

Hence exemption from even the basic civility of shaking hands with government partners. It’s not principled, as there are no such qualms about loyalist terrorists. Our First Minister was photographed shaking hands with UDA brigadier Jackie McDonald in Stormont in January 2013, yet, even now, he still won’t shake hands with the Deputy First Minister. That’s difficult to sustain in the modern world; a refusal to dignify people’s humanity as equals. This is no small thing – it goes to the essence of our problem. It reveals a shocking lack of evolution from the Plantation view of the ‘wood-kern’, or the ‘Punch’ magazine caricature of nationalists, unfit for Home Rule, necessitating Partition.

It has dangerous consequences. To borrow an economic phrase, there is a ‘trickle-down effect’, facilitating dehumanising sectarianism on the street, as enacted by the mob who attacked Mayor Máirtín Ó Muilleoir at Woodvale Park, in contrast to the respectful warm reception of loyalists like McDonald himself at Féile an Phobail on the Falls Road. Likewise, it validates the refusal of loyalist marchers to speak to local residents: no need to treat them as equals if your tradition is to march where you want. Ian Paisley’s preparedness to have personal interaction with the Deputy First Minister, not the cold ‘business-like’ reductivism of which the DUP now boast, was one of principle reasons they turned against him.

There are endless examples of Unionist double-standards on Loyalist terrorism. The UWC strike, opposition to banning the UDA, Hugh Smyth’s selection as Mayor when Sinn Fein were verboten, Willie McCrea’s relationship with Billy Wright, Trimble’s UUP entering the Good Friday talks flanked by UDA and UVF representatives in a calculatedly striking tableau. Peter Robinson and Sammy Wilson carried the coffin of UDA boss Ray Smallwoods (for some reason that receives somewhat less attention than similar).

Unionist Exceptionalism, superiority, necessitates exclusivity and separatism. The old term ‘Protestant ascendancy’ is just too nakedly pre-modern, so separatism is expressed by the term ‘the PUL (Protestant-Unionist-Loyalist)’, still, by definition, excluding Catholics. It is the pre-modern definition of political identity as ethnicity. Conversely, republicanism is a modern ideology, flowing from inclusive Enlightenment ideals like citizenship. Necessary apartness is justified with quotation of 2 Corinthians 6:17, ‘come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you.’

Attempts to appropriate modern ‘rights’ language for PUL ascendancy backfire. A recent example, on the Nolan TV show  (4/6/14), was DUP MLA William Humphrey arguing the baldly contradictory position that it is ‘a human right’ for Orangemen to march past Ardoyne but that a republican parade on the same route would be wrong.

Tonally, Unionism, predicated on confrontation, is given to hysteria: the hyperbolic ‘ripping down’ language of the December 2012 flag leaflet, ‘culture war’, and Robinson’s ‘steam coming out my ears’ re: Haas. This been normalised, warping our discourse, as so often we hear of ‘Unionist fury’ as ‘Unionists have reacted angrily’ to proposals. We don’t often hear of ‘nationalist fury’.

Unionism’s anachronistic confrontational anger jars with the conversational dynamic of television now, giving us apoplectic audience contributions, and panellists whose countenances often exude their arrogant disdain – being, in Yeats’s words, ‘an image of such politics’.

Modern technology, in a proliferation of social media and cameras, increasingly exposes the inexcusable excesses of Twaddell-type protest, and the occasional lapse into murder-fantasy, to say nothing of the incompatibility of tyre pyres with modernity.





  • Zeno

    Good one…….lol

  • Andrew G Mooney

    Feck,flegs & bonfire haterz intrude on #TDF…*sulks* Trust me, those in that cultural affiliation who are intoxicated by hate, are full of self-hate & the homophobes, in particular….protest..too…much with their fake Alpha-Male anger…what, exactly, are some of them so angry about that they can’t bear the sight of openly gay folk in ‘their’ country? I guess hating on black people is just another way to transfer their self-hate onto the Other? But it only works for a while then they have to face their torment again. I have Protestant friends in the northern part of Ireland who have no issues whatsoever with gays, blacks, or Catholics.But some of them live in places where they have to guard what they say: and who they link to on The Social Media…

  • Am Ghobsmacht

    Yes, I understand that they are not officially closed to other religions, it’s not what I meant, I meant that things such as they are in NI Protestants won’t send their kids to Catholic schools, there is something ‘closing’ them off to most Protestants.
    Which is why I don’t see any validity in the comparison with other countries.
    As with other discussions that seek to fob off the non-segregated education, I never suggested a ‘sudden’ enforced mix.
    There have been ample opportunities, in the name of budget cuts and refurbishment to mix some schools;
    In the past decade or so St Pius (Moneymore Rd, magherafelt) and Magherafelt High School (100m down the same Moneymore Road) have had either massive refit or an entirely new school.
    The ‘new school’ came about during the time of the economic crash.
    In the meantime another integrated school has been built (from the same stressed budget).
    Now, really, would it not have been cheaper to merge 3 schools (two of which are in ‘spitting’ distance of each other (and I emphasise the word ‘spitting’)) rather than refit one and build another two?
    Not to mention that the St Pius pupils have to walk through/past MHS to get to the nearby leisure centre.
    There are enough schools nearby for anyone who wants their kids to be educated in a more Catholic background.
    Surely that is just common sense?
    Then you have the ‘shared campus’ in Omagh, several schools with several principles and different uniforms all under the one roof.
    I mean, really, what’s the point?!
    So, it doesn’t have to be an overnight thing, in the name of the budgetary axe, this could be brought about sensibly, efficiently and in mixed areas.
    So you’ll still have you Catholic education for those that have to have it and you’ll have Protestants exposed to Catholics, Gaelic culture and wot not.
    It may dilute the Orange and Loyalist culture that prevails in some Protestant secondaries, which in turn will affect the rogues’ gallery that you listed above.
    How many people in the DUP, the OO, the UDA etc went to mixed schools?
    I know a few Orangemen who did but they are amongst the least hard line in their own particular lodge. Coincidence? Methinks not.
    Zeno, the current state of affairs has the potential to turn good people into bigots. I have witnessed this first hand.
    There are enough sectarian pitfalls without education lending a hand, regardless of how unintentional that lending hand maybe.

  • Zeno

    In my experience the people who send their kids to Integrated Schools and on Cross Community schemes are the ones who don’t really need to.They are the already enlightened.
    Bitter sectarian Parents are never going to send or allow their children to participate in cross community bridge building projects because they themselves are sectarian. They probably have the gift of seeing themselves as not even being bigots so again I say. The problem is not with children. It is with the Parents.
    How could a child of biter sectarian Parents handle of the conflict and contradictions of meeting and liking people from the other side when their own parents hate and detest them? Again I’m thinking of 5 years olds.

  • Am Ghobsmacht

    OK Zeno.

    1/ Taking my scenario above regarding the ‘merger’ (note, NOT integration) of St Pius, MHS and MISC (or whatever they’re called) the only ones who can opt out are those who wish to send their kids to a purely Catholic school for religious reasons.

    That might be possibly all of the St Pius cohort, in which case all I can say is there has obviously been some sort of evangelical revolution since my school days …

    In my scenario the ‘unenlightened’ have no choice: send your kids to the new state school (which includes Gaelic games and Irish language as subject choices as well as sitting beside themuns) or send them to Ballymena or form a private school from their own pocket.

    Those who are intrinsically opposed to schooling their children alongside the fenians will probably go to such lengths, others will send their kids under strict instructions not to dabble in taigy arts and others will send their kids utterly indifferent to the change in circumstances.

    In any case, more Protestants will be exposed to the ‘foreign’ ways of Catholics and vice-versa.

    There is a constant stream of evidence on this very site that Gaelic games aren’t as wholesomely offensive to younger Protestants as the flat earth society would have us believe.

    There’s also signs of a small Gaelic renaissance amongst some Protestants.

    Some of them, somewhere along the line might have a stab. Few of them have this opportunity at present (as far as I’m aware, things may have changed though).
    With regards to the 5 year olds:

    They might believe everything their parents tell them and start to hate the person they went to playschool with or they might do what children do and ignore their parents.

    After all, they’ve been to playschool with little Micky and so far he hasn’t stolen any of their toys, unlike little Billy, the sticky fingered so and so.

    In either case, if a parent spews dogma to a child about ‘themuns’ and yet 7 years later the kid is good friends with one of themuns well, it might have greater implications for the parent-child relationship than the class room friend relationship.

    Look, I understand what you’re saying but thruthfully answer me this:

    Who is more likely to be bigoted:

    1/ Someone with bigoted parents who fills their head full of sectarian rubbish and goes through 12 years of education without hardly ever speaking to one of themuns.

    2/ Someone with bigoted parents who fills their head full of sectarian rubbish and goes through 12 years of

    mixed education and has therefore potentially sat beside them, spoke to them, fancied them, fought them, fought alongside them, played sports with them, acted in a play with them, been invited to their birthdays, been invited to their sports games….
    Seriously Zeno, you can’t say it’s 50-50? Really?
    It is not a magic cure but it is a step in the right direction.
    I only get more convinced of this the more people throw digital arguments at me.