Ní Chuilín stops (unexplained) HET blocking move on release of inquest documents to relatives

It’s hard to disagree with Brian when he says there is no real serious attempt to deal with the past. On the Republican side, the understanding is that that is not possible until everything is dealt with. But in the meantime some families have been trying to use the mechanisms of the state to try and get closer to the truth of what happened to their loved ones.

As John noted here on Slugger, the re-opening of an inquest into the deaths of victims during the Ballymurphy killings of August 1971, was something of a landmark case. But now, it seems, someone is trying to throw a spanner in those particular works.

Here’s Vincent Kearney’s report from last night’s Newsline:

YouTube video

The BBC report notes:

In a letter to the families’ solicitor, Ms Ní Chuilín said that after taking advice from the attorney general, she had concluded there was no credible or compelling reason for withholding the files, and included copies of the documents requested.

“I don’t believe the public record office were in a position to make that decision independently, I think that decision was mine to make,” the minister told the BBC.

“I absolutely support the solicitor’s argument on behalf of the families. The families did indeed have a right to this information and I believe they should have had the information a long time ago.”

A spokesman for the HET said it had not raised any objections to the court papers being released.

Hmmmm… this is a good example of the system actually working and the minister using due process (ie, the considerable weight of the AG’s office) to stop a blocking move from the HET (or the PSNI, who’ve not actually issued a statement on this), for which there has been no reason beyond the boiler plate text offered…

Discover more from Slugger O'Toole

Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.