Harbottle & Lewis letter could spell real trouble for Murdoch…

Turgon last night noted the issue of the two letters. Clive Goodman might be dismissed as a sacked journo with an axe to grind but the law firm Harbottle and Lewis’ involvement may prove rather more tricky to deal with. As George Eaton notes the company:

…criticises the pair’s evidence to the select committee as “hard to credit” and “self-serving”. The law firm points out that its investigation was limited to whether Goodman hacked phones with the knowledge of other journalists, not whether “general” criminality took place at the tabloid. Thus, it was dishonest of the Murdochs to present a letter from the firm as evidence that News International had received a clean bill of health.

Hmmmm… In effect, Murdoch Junior was rather carelessly accusing a law firm, his company employed, of not doing its job properly… This one could get very nasty, independently of any further journalistic enterprise in this story…

Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger.

While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.