This is not going to be a fun or light hearted blog. I hope I can address this issue in as serious a fashion as it behoves. Can I say at the outset that I personally have never had a close friend or relative commit suicide and as such I cannot fully understand the personal emotions and trauma that this produces. If in any way I offend anyone I am truly sorry but I do feel this is an issue which is not addressed as much as it should be. I will very deliberately talk only in general terms about this and will not mention any local events.
Many years ago I was at a course in Scotland; a respected psychiatrist from Scotland stated that suicide was rare in Northern Ireland and claimed that this low rate was common in societies in conflict. There is certainly some data to back up this suggestion. Historically, however, the only deaths recorded by the coroner as suicide were those where the victim left a note; otherwise the death was recorded as accidental. This was in part (and I would suggest appropriately) to spare the family the trauma and indeed shame and opprobrium attached in the past to such a death; with at times difficulties having a burial in consecrated ground. As such it may be difficult to compare historical figures with current ones.

The reality now is that the suicide rate in Northern Ireland is actually quite high, in 2001 it was not quite double that for England and Wales though for the period 2002-2004 the rates in Northern Ireland were lower than Scotland or Wales and little higher than England.

The Investing for Health document shows an increase in suicide rates over the period 1987 to 2003 albeit with significant yearly variation. The variability of suicide rates amongst different groups and different localities is interesting. Suicide rates are highest amongst young men aged 15-34, which is a fairly typical finding word wide. At the risk of being controversial; suicide is more common in predominantly Roman Catholic areas, however, the report stresses that this may not reflect a significant difference due to the number of people living in mixed areas and does not take into account economic deprivation in different areas. It is also modestly more common in urban than rural areas and significantly so amongst those in socially deprived areas. The highest risk employments are own account workers and small employers closely followed by long term unemployed and never worked groups.

Groups at particular risk of suicide include, unsurprisingly, the mentally ill. Those with schizophrenia are notorious amongst psychiatrists for very rarely being a danger to other people (contrary to some popular myths) but a significant danger to themselves. Clearly psychiatric care can help but apart from detaining people indefinitely in mental institutions as we used to there is little way of completely preventing this problem. That of course leaves aside the inappropriateness of making people stay indefinitely in the old “lunatic asylums” and the fact that not infrequently they managed to kill themselves there. Persons with personality disorders also have high suicide rates. Unfortunately such people are extremely difficult to treat and although they may make many attempts before a successful suicide again there is little obvious way to completely prevent this. The provision of increased mental health services after the latest budget may have some effect and also highlighting counselling and other services may bring benefits but is unlikely to abolish the problem.

Amongst the most disturbing recent developments has been the occurrence of spates of suicide amongst teenagers and young people, sometimes in clusters. Concerns have been expressed that sometimes these episodes have a “copy cat” element which is a truly awful concept. However, despite sensationalist claims in the tabloid press over a recent spate of suicides in Bridgend, South Wales the police report no evidence of any link.

The hysteria currently being drummed up by the media could imply that many suicides can be explained by a number of social networking internet sites frequented by young people and hence, stopping them would solve the problem. Whilst regulation or even closure of some aspects of these sites, which currently seems to be being considered, might have some effect; it is unlikely to solve much of this problem. Clearly improved mental health services and the provision of counselling have considerable merit and sound like common sense solutions though acquiring clinical evidence of their efficacy is not especially easy. However, there are other problems related to economic deprivation and loss of social and family cohesion which are prevalent throughout much of the Western world. These problems are vastly more difficult to address but I would submit that all these issues need to be considered as this is a significant problem within our society which merits serious discussion and examination of any possible solutions; incremental as any one of them will undoubtedly be.

Discover more from Slugger O'Toole

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Categories Uncategorised

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.