prospect of co-operation has become less likely

The findings of an investigation into Devolution in the UK – The Impact on Politics, Economy and Society by the Economic and Social Research Council, at a cost of around £5million, into the impact of devolution in Northern Ireland, England, Scotland and Wales are being discussed at a seminar in the University of Ulster today. Out of a total of 38 research projects, 17 dealt with the situation in Northern Ireland in some form. The report is being published, but doesn’t appear to be online yet. The press release has some interesting details though.. as does this UTV reportFrom the Univeristy of Ulster press release

The research found that four aspects of the Agreement encouraged, rather than constrained, antagonism between politicians:

The restatement of the consent principle confining constitutional options to the ‘either/or’ choice, to be determined by simple majority plebiscite, thus encouraging a sectarian headcount approach to politics.

The reaffirmation of the single transferable vote for assembly elections which allows and encourages candidates to be elected by mobilizing core votes within a particular community rather than providing incentives for cross-community electoral mobilization.

The requirement that assembly members designate themselves as unionist, nationalist or other thereby consolidating communalist mindsets and preventing any possible realignment along more conventional left-right lines.

The appointment of Ministers one-by-one which encouraged them to think of their departments as individual fiefdoms and worked against joined up government and collective responsibility that might have glued the power-sharing government together and provided a model for wider reconciliation.

The report says that the prospect of politicians to co-operate has become less likely amid the electoral polarization which has seen the DUP and Sinn Fein become the biggest power blocs. But it points out that a survey of DUP voters shows there are signs of movement towards a position favourable for a relaunch of devolution.

Between 1998 and 2003 support for cross-border bodies among those voters increased from 21% to 39%; support for power-sharing doubled from 35% to 71%; support for the Assembly rose from 69% to 73% and belief that DUP party leaders should be willing to compromise increased from 30% to 38%.

The report concluded: “Yet those signs of movement reinforce the point made above; while people in Northern Ireland are favourably disposed to devolution, their political leaders may not be minded to take the steps that would make devolution work.

“They remain bound up in a continuing ‘either/or’ battle about the UK versus a united Ireland. In the present circumstances, in particular in the absence of a commitment to co-operation between Northern Ireland’s two largest parties, DUP and Sinn Fein” that would appear to mean continued direct rule by Westminster”.

The report found that two political shifts are needed to break the current devolution logjam:

a revisiting of the structures set up by the Good Friday Agreement to ensure that institutions encourage conciliatory rather than confrontational political behaviour.

a strong commitment to address the simmer resentments in the wider society which a peace process focused narrowly on the political elites has done little to address – building on the policy framework on community relations, A Shared Future, launched in March 2005.[all emphasis added]

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.