Clarification sought on ambiguous statement

Sinn Féin’s Alex Maskey is demanding that the DUP ‘must clarify’ position on their response to the comments by his party’s president, Gerry Adams, on the possibility that the IRA might be persuaded to be removed from the equation in the ‘right’ context of “an ongoing process of sustainable change”.

While the BBC, optimistically, claims that there was a “clear signal” in what Adams had to say, other commentators (including David McKittrick, The Independent Ireland Correspondent – RealOne player required)
have pointed out the ambiguities in the original comments and regard it as part of a process of the two parties “positioning themselves” prior to the September talks. In which case, would Alex Maskey not be better to seek clarification closer to home first? Or is it a case of Sinn Féin being stung by the generally luke-warm reaction?


Discover more from Slugger O'Toole

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.