Education proposals: private education at public expense…

When the Education Minister is getting flack from the Andersonstown News you know she’s in trouble. As John O’Dowd has pointed out, the proposal she is laying in front of the Executive Committee on Thursday is substantially the same as she brought forward nearly a year ago – an indication, perhaps, that the widely toured ‘consultation’ has had little effect on the development of the policy. Malachi O’Doherty, a fan of non selection, is blunt: “The case against academic selection in our schools is lost…”He goes on:

Catholic schools, which were opposed to the 11 plus have changed their minds. Not all of them have declared openly yet the decisions that they have taken. But dozens have, and many more in the coming weeks will. This is a development which has astonished and disheartened many who are close to it. The nice bright middle-class children are to have the benefit of something like a private educational sector, without having to pay for it. [emphasis added]

It’s a scenario that was rather inexactly predicted by Newton Emerson some four years ago, long before the incumbent Minister took up her office. He predicted a disaster for an initiative that has been marked by ideological certainty rather than for grappling directly with educational reality:

Politicians who shamelessly compare themselves to Martin Luther King and Nelson Mandela promote segregation and hiring practices straight from Wallace’s Alabama and de Klerk’s South Africa. Asking parents to accept all this and a failed comprehensive model as well is an ideological step too far – and how ironic that the maintained sector should be the first to feel the squeeze, having single-handedly created the Catholic middle class whose aspirations it now scorns.

Emerson’s prediction is only falsified in one particular aspect. Rather than face a long slow extinction, the Catholic Grammars have voted with their feet and one by one have walked away from both the Minister and the Church hierarchy’s express wishes.

Which indicates that this initiative was something of a car crash primed to happen the moment Sinn Fein decided on a comprehensive policy it simply did not (despite John O’Dowd’s threat to governors at the end of his spake on Stormont Live) have sufficient power to enforce; nor a compelling solution to the education problems that particularly beset urban working classes communities…

It suggests the policy, rather than the minister, was at fault. She may end up carrying the can, but whomsoever had been briefed to take this party policy forward would have, inevitably, suffered the same fate.


Discover more from Slugger O'Toole

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.