Gordon Brown may not have helped the Union cause

The papers have caught up with Slugger on Gordon Brown’s emergence from political purdah to join the debate over Scottish independence. Brown it will be noted isn’t claiming an Olympic effect on a referendum that’s over two years away. His argument is in two parts; first, the Better Together case.   

One thing I take from the Olympics, a point that Sir Chris Hoy has already made for me – when we pool and share resources for the common good the benefit is far greater than would have occurred if we’d just added up the sum of the parts. So the National Health Service is common insurance policy … the BBC, shared across the United Kingdom. The armed forces, so you don’t have a Scottish, a Welsh and an English army.

Then he opens a substantially new front that no party has wished to confront – probably because it applies nearly as much to devo max as well , the dangers of fiscal competition.

The danger of breaking up what he called “fiscal union”, was he said, that in Scotland “you will either have to cut public expenditure enormously, beyond what is already being done, or you are going to have tax Scottish people more. Fiscal autonomy means more taxes in Scotland.”

If the union were broken up, he said, “there would be regionally varied minimum wages, and a race to the bottom, with one unit trying to undercut the other. Break up and you will have different social security rates but you will end with pensioners being treated completely differently in different parts of Britain, or unemployed or disabled people. And people will think that’s not progress, that’s moving backwards.”

Meanwhile manoeuvres between Westminster and Holyrood are intensifying over a one or two question ballot. The Telegraph reports muddled talks between the two sides, with Westminster saying in terms, we’ll start the ball rolling soon  to give Holyrood the legal powers to hold a referendum – if they agree to  the single yes, no question. This seems partly designed to flush out Salmond’s commitment to a second question on devo max and abandon his current coyness.

What’s the betting he comes out the closet on this? The battle will then truly be joined on the issue at least as crucial as the referendum date.   The problem for the pro-Union forces is that devo max – aka “fiscal autonomy” splits them. It will be harder for them to resolve this than it is for the SNP. The referendum timetable is not the big issue for Alex Salmond.


Discover more from Slugger O'Toole

Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.