Mr No Vote wins 17/18 …

logo from scraperwiki.comA bunch of hacks (programmers) and hackers (journalists – real and citizen!) attended ScraperWiki‘s workshop in the University of Ulster Belfast campus on Saturday.

The idea was to unearth benefit and stories from the public data, if necessary using robotic data scraping techniques to lift facts and figures out of ill-formatted webpages into a more useful database format to explore the connections.

Three teams formed, looking at NI Court decisions, comparing pay levels across public, private and voluntary vacancies advertised on Jobfinder, and looking at NI electoral turnout and how this maps onto other social statistics.

Ivor Whitten’s written up a comprehensive post over on Hand of History. Our team’s hacker Rob Moore worked with Ivor, Matt Johnston and myself to scrape some sample data out of Ark and then reprocess it. If we’re honest, it’s been a while since any of us programmed in Python (or PHP) … but we’ll achieve more next time!

Map of NI showing 2010 Westminster election results - from Ark Election site ark.co.uk/election

Given the levels of turnout at the May 2010 Westminster election, in 17 out of the 18 local constituencies the number of people not voting beat was greater than the winning candidate. Here’s what the map would look like if all those people had been forced to vote, but had chosen “None of the above” on the ballot paper.

Map of NI showing how turnout affected 2010 Westminster election results - adapted from Ark Election site ark.co.uk/election

To repeat, not only does no candidate achieve a 50% mandate of the potential electorate (and few even achieve a 50% majority of those who did vote), but in nearly all constituencies the votes for the winning politician are outnumbered by the number of people who couldn’t be bothered to cast any vote.

I’d assumed that Gerry Adams’ large majority in West Belfast would be the constituency where he beat the stay at home voters. But no. It was in the split seat of Fermanagh and South Tyrone where both the main unionist and nationalist candidates just outpolled the no shows.

As Ivor asked:

… was the only motivator to get bigger numbers out to vote sectarianism? Looked like it as a riled divided community seemed determined not to let the other side in.

It’s not rocket science, and it’s not novel, but it’s still a stark statistic.

With a bit of work to extend the proof of concept – using some of the raw data from EONI too – we should be able to turn around interesting stats within hours of the May 2011 election results. And the data will be available to everyone else through ScraperWiki.

Map adapted (greyified!) from Conal Kelly’s maps over on the Ark election site.


Discover more from Slugger O'Toole

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.