“Talk amongst yourselves while I put my blindfold on.”

Mick’s former colleague at the Telegraph blog, Shane Richmond, has spotted a “disappointing” High Court ruling on the exemption for liability of Labourhome.org site operator Alex Hilton for a potentially libellous post above the fold that would also seem to apply to what’s said in the comments zone. From Shane’s post

In a judgment at the end of last month Mr Justice Stadlen ruled that even fixing the grammar or spelling in a users’ posts could make a publication liable for the content. Struan Robertson of Pinsent Masons, quoted on the Out-Law blog, said: “Even an attempt to filter for profanities or comment spam, if done manually, involves a risk for the publisher. If you want to be sure that you’re not liable for what your users say, the judge is basically saying you need to ignore user contributions completely until you get a complaint.” [added emphasis]

I usually try my best to do just that… [*ahem* – Ed] Oh, and Mick, I apologise in advance! Just in case…

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.