Ex top prosecutor defends the “crooked line” of morality

English Directors of Public Prosecutions past and present are setting a record for newsworthy comment. First, the present incumbent Keir Starmer cried shame at Cameron’s idea of replacing the Human Right Act. Note that Starmer wants to catch up with NI practice and substitute “public” for “Crown” prosecution service). And now his predecessor Ken Macdonald makes a powerful, piercingly honest case shorn of humbug for using information gathered through torture by foreign agencies and the non-prosecution of MI6 officers allegedly involved There is a careful, highly selective read-across to the Troubles. Needless to say, we’ll all have out own versions. Any chance of a peep from the local equivalent or a presser from the local lord chief justice? In the interests of accountability, chaps, like your English counterparts?
Macdonald says:

So, what of torture, an ultimate abuse of state power? Of course, the practice is always beyond law and salvation, and yet the line between using material obtained this way and complicity in the crimes that create it is more crooked than we’d like to allow.

His scathing verdict on some of the Blair era’s emergency legislation sheds light on the continuing tension between politicians and the legal establishment. And this guy was a prosecutor, for heaven’s sake!.

It is, of course, a great shame that the Government has wildly devalued their dilemma by pretending that the choices we face are starker than they usually are: the elevation of security paranoia to attack our constitution for purely party political advantage was a particular disgrace in the Blair years.
It is a shocking degradation of left-of-centre politics that this cowardice failed to make us any safer and simultaneously encouraged foolish disbelief in the State itself.


Discover more from Slugger O'Toole

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Categories Uncategorised

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.