Eames-Bradley: A Question of Hierarchy

Alan McBride, whose wife and father-in-law were killed in the1993 Shankill bombing, works for the victim support group WAVE and supports the One Small Step Campaign. A recent article by him questioning the Eames Bradley support for dispensing with a ‘hierarchy of victims’ ethic for the Belfast Telegraph is replicated below the fold:By Alan McBride

Having been involved in the Victims and Survivors sector for the past ten years, I have lost count of the number of times I have heard it said, “there can be no hierarchy of victims” – I have even said it myself on more than one occasion. At one level the statement rings true – Robin Eames, speaking at the launch of the Bradley Eames report, said that frequently during the consultation period on dealing with the past, people of all persuasions acknowledged that “a mother’s tears are all the same”. Few could disagree with this sentiment and I do not intend to undermine that.

Indeed I have often acknowledged, in my own case of losing my wife in the Shankill bomb, that the mother of the bomber Thomas Begley hurts much like myself. In fact, it could be argued that her pain is more acute, due to the fact that she not only lost a son but that she also has to live with the knowledge that her son killed nine other people. That being the case I believe Mrs Begley should receive all the help society can give her to help her deal with her tragedy; but I have always stopped short of suggesting that that should be monetary in nature. There is something about money that changes the dynamic of how we view situations like this. For example, the suggestion in the Bradley Eames report, that the family of a person who was killed planting a bomb should receive the same ‘recognition’ payment as the families of those that they killed, is just plain wrong.

It’s wrong for all sorts of reasons; but primarily because in the eyes of most people it appears to equate the death of a perpetrator with that of their victim, and that brings me back to this question of ‘hierarchy’. It’s the ‘elephant in the room’, the issue no one wants to address; unsurprisingly our fledgling Assembly appear to have side stepped it, preferring instead for the Victims’ Commission to deal with it once they set up the Victims’ Forum. Whether we agree or not, a ‘hierarchy’ exists in the sense that not every one was guilty and not every one was innocent.

A lot of what happened in the Troubles was wrong and should never be dressed up in “we have all hurt and we have all been hurt” language. This only serves to antagonise the families of those who were truly innocent, and results in the sort of angry scenes observed at the Europa recently. I am of the opinion that it would go some way to healing the hurts of the past if we injected a little bit of honesty into the process. Maybe it could be “one small step” to acknowledge that we are not all in the same place in relation to how we have been affected by or contributed to the conflict. Some have caused more hurt than others and some been more innocent.

That is one reason why I am of the opinion that we should not simply blame everything on the paramilitaries: yes they were the principal contributors to the killing, yes they are responsible for what they did; and yes they should step forward and accept personal responsibility for their actions, instead of trying to rewrite history; but they were a symptom of our conflict, not the cause, and it suits many dark agendas to try to obscure that. Others played a less obvious role, be it the security forces whenever they stepped outside the law, the churches or mainland politicians whenever they turned a blind eye, local politicians who made careers out of maintaining the ‘two tribe’ mentality, and anyone else who engaged in sectarian thinking of any kind. This does not mean that we are all equally responsible for the death and injury, but we certainly need to acknowledge that we all share some responsibility for helping society to move forward.

I suppose this is where I part company with some of the protesters seen at the Europa. Yes there is a ‘hierarchy’ of victims, a ‘hierarchy’ of right and wrong if you like, and as such I think that should be stated. But there can be no ‘hierarchy’ when it comes to meeting peoples needs – a mother’s tears are all the same, and as such they should receive whatever help they need in order to move on. That should be the focus in any mechanism designed to deal with the past.

First published in the Belfast Telegraph///

  • Democratic

    Excellent article – a man with a functioning moral compass!
    Not a bitter word in site either despite the injustices foisted upon him…..many could learn.

    “a ‘hierarchy’ exists in the sense that not every one was guilty and not every one was innocent.”

    There cannot be any real argument to this point in my mind….despite the best efforts of those who would do their utmost to try and muddy such clear waters.

  • William

    Democrat….to me Alan has become part of the ‘victims industry’, those who have set up groups and depend on Government money for their salaries and running costs. He has becomen institutionalised in his viewpoint…repeating what the Government views are….the definiton of victim being a point. Alan supports the viewpoint that caused so much fuss when the idiots on the Eames / Bradley group reported that ‘all victims are the same’. Well, they are NOT!!

    I chair a victim’s group that has never received a penny from anyone other than the general public.

    As to victims….of course there is a hierachy. Sinn Fein / IRA has seen to that. Didn’t Sinn Fein / IRA insist on high cost Inquiries into ‘Bloody Sunday’, Finucane, Nelson and got them….where is the equivalent for those from the Protestant / Unionist community murdered at the behest of some who are now in Government?

    Don’t tell me Wright and Breen / Buchanan….they should have had investigations anyway…killed in a jail and two Senior Police officers killed returning home after meeting their Gardai counterparts in Dundalk.

    I walked in 1996 in the Long March for Real Victims…innocent people killed by terrorists of whatever political colour. I don’t count those terrorists killed as the same as the nine persons killed in my home village….they were innocent, IRA / UDA / UVF / INLA or other terrorists killed in the course of their actions were not. They lived by the gun / bomb and died by it and are in no way innocent.

  • west belfast

    I hate to get involved in whataboutery but sometimes its just necessary.

    William what about the people killed by the RUC, UDR and British Army? Bloody Sunday, Ballymurphy, plastic bullet victims.

    Also have you read the whole report? I think you would agree with a lot of what was said about inquiries etc by your comments.

  • Mick Fealty

    William,

    What about commenting on what the man says instead of grinding another man-playing axe?

  • Sterling Silver Bracelets, Mexican Silver Jewelry
    Sterling Silver Charms

  • The Shankill bombing was such a sad time in history for many people. A lot of lives were lost, and it’s important we not forget them.

  • There seems to be a hierarchy everywhere in this world
    http://www.infolinkit.com.au/

  • The first use of the word “hierarchy” cited by the Oxford English Dictionary was in 1880, when it was used in reference to the three orders of three angels as depicted by Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite. Pseudo-Dionysius used the word both in reference to the celestial hierarchy and the ecclesiastical hierarchy.

  • Every one would like to see flat society. Karl Marx wanted it. Lenin wanted it. Stalin fought for it. But, somehow capitalism bounces back