Perhaps the most striking feature about the reaction to the Eames-Bradley Report was the speed with which the DUP returned to the pre-St Andrews mode of outright rejection of proposals/ initiatives on behalf of unionism, in spite of more mature responses from that very quarter- including some interesting individuals.
The truth, of course, is that the ‘£12,000 proposal’ that so enraged certain elements within political Unionism did so primarily because it challenged the narrative that there exists real victims of the conflict that can be clearly separated from the others by virtue of a monochrome prism which ably assists in the process of selecting which victims to deem worthy of proper remembrance and, presumably, compensation.
Thats not to say that victims on all sides did not -and do not- have their own genuinely felt emotions about this proposal.
Mick has mentioned the ability of the Irish to confer sainthood on individuals and in the process, to quote Niall Ferguson, keep the bitterness alive. Of course, there can be no greater example of this than in the annual commemoration of the subjugation of the catholic Irish that is the Twelfth of July celebrations, with all its associated baggage- not to mention commemorating the relief of Derry from the indigenous Irish. Of course, examples of Irish nationalists commemorating their dead also illustrate a similar desire to remember past torch-holders, albeit with less intensity.
It was entirely appropriate that the DUP DCAL Minister, Gregory Campbell, would use the opportunity of the Eames-Bradley launch to finally attempt to bury the Maze/ Long Kesh stadium proposal. The partys preference for an Ulster Rugby/ ‘Norn Iron’ only stadium (preferably in East Belfast, no less) has been public knowledge for some time, and the inferred exclusion of all things Irish from the preferred stadia ties in neatly with the exclusive narrative preferred by DUP stalwarts.
But there are problems abound for the largest party within unionism. For one, the decision to cry foul over the compensation proposal would appear to run contrary to the political consensus as picked up by the Eames-Bradley group during its meetings with political representatives- which Dennis Bradley was keen to point out in numerous media briefings immediately after the launch.
And, perhaps, more decisively, the DUPs acceptance of a Victims Commission delicately balanced with a close relative of a victim of British State violence and a relative of a victim of republican violence speaks more convincingly about the partys real position regarding the compromises that need to be made as we move ahead as a society than the gallery playing that has been in evidence in recent days.
“Still in that jungle, still digging foxholes”
Recent posts
We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!
For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.
Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.
If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.