There has been some discussion about Jutland recently and I have suggested I will do a blog on it so here goes. If it is not your thing just ignore it and I know it is too long and too detailed. One of the first problems with Jutland which divides most real historians (ie folk much cleverer than me) is who won. The history of who won is itself important. Initially both sides claimed victory: then the British largely came to believe that indeed the Germans won (the British did lose more ships). Latterly most suggest that it was a modest tactical victory for the Germans but a significant strategic victory for the British. I am of course biased on that and will accept criticism of that analysis. This is also not an exhaustive analysis and I have tried to make it readable. For the interested this is one of the best websites and I would recommend Robert Massie’s book as one of the most readable accounts.

The next thing we need to mention briefly is the sorts of ships involved. In 1904 Jackie Fisher became First Sea Lord and in 1906 HMS Dreadnought entered service. She was a stunning advance over all previous battleships and instantly made all her predecessors obsolete. The world’s powers then embarked on a building programme of these ships and by the outbreak of the First World War all sides had a number of these ships. Battleships were designed to sink other battleships. There is, however, another group of ships, a brief understanding of which is vital to analysing Jutland: they are battlecruisers. These were ships as large as battleships with slightly fewer (equally large) guns but higher speeds. They also had less armour (especially the British ones). They had been intended to roam the seas sinking other nation’s cruisers, which themselves were used to sink merchant ships. However, against Fisher’s plans they ended up being used in fleet actions against other battleships and battlecruisers.

Turning to Jutland itself: the British fleet was mainly based at Scapa Flow in the Orkneys. Some were based at Sheerness and the battlecruisers based at Rosyth. The Germans could not hope to defeat the whole British Grand Fleet and so hoped to split it and sink parts of it to reduce the British numerical advantage.

As such the whole German High Seas Fleet set sail hoping to catch Beatty’s battlecruisers. The Grand Fleet set out on 30th May 1916 hoping to catch the whole German fleet. The plan was for Beatty to lure the Germans to Jellicoe’s Grand Fleet of battleships.

At about 3.30pm the battlecruisers began to fire at one another: Beatty failed to use his ships superior speed to keep the Germans under Admiral Hipper at long range where his longer range guns would have been unable to be answered. As such although the British battlecruisers inflicted considerable damage on the more heavily armoured German battlecruisers, the Germans sank two British battlecruisers HMS Indefatigable and HMS Queen Mary. These ships seem to have been hit on turrets with a flash fire then causing the magazines to explode. In each case practically the whole crew were killed. The flash fires were in part because the British battlecruisers were known to have poor accuracy and as such Beatty, against admiralty directives, allowed more shells to be kept in the turrets to allow faster rates of firing and hence, when the turrets were hit: a vast explosion. Beatty’s own ship HMS Lion should have suffered the same fate but the dying turret officer Francis Harvey ordered the turret flooded saving the ship (he received a posthumous Victoria Cross).

To add to Beatty’s problems the German battleships now arrived on the scene. At this point the German plan was working perfectly and it was quite clear even to the relatively reckless Beatty that he faced the annihilation of his ships. As such he increased speed to try to escape. He was saved, however, largely by the arrival of the 5th battle squadron. These ships of the Queen Elizabeth class were the most powerful warships of their day: almost as fast as battlecruisers (due to oil power rather than coal: oil sourced from Iraq which Britain became involved in, in order to supply the fleet), they were however very heavily armoured and possessed eight 15” guns, the largest and most powerful guns any warship had. These four ships (Warspite, Valiant, Malaya and Barham) then fought a running battle with the whole German fleet bearing down on them. All save Valiant were damaged and Warspite had to limp home at the end of the battle. They, however, were more accurate than the battlecruisers and inflicted heavy damage on the German battlecruisers and the leading line of German battleships under admiral Scheer.

The day was still, however, going the way of the Germans and, powerful as the Queen Elizabeths were, the Germans still anticipated victory. Beatty rejoined the battle along with more battlecruisers that were with the Grand Fleet and another British battlecruiser HMS Invincible promptly blew up.

Then, however, the situation changed. As Scheer’s battleships came through a patch of fog they saw the whole of Jellicoe’s grant fleet turning to face them. The leading German battleships were facing forward: the British coming crosswise to “Cross the T.” This would allow all the British guns to fire on the Germans yet they would be unable to fire anything like as many guns in reply. The British had 24 battleships as well as the 4 Queen Elizabeths and the surviving battlecruisers. The Germans had 16 battleships and 5 battlecruisers and were in a considerably inferior firing position: Jellicoe’s plan had worked perfectly. Whilst the German battlecruisers were superior to the British ones, the British battleships had as good armour as the Germans and larger guns. The moment for destruction of the Germans had arrived; another Trafalgar was presented before the Royal Navy. Scheer, however, rather impolitely, refused to be play the role the British wished to assign him to and much to Jellicoe’s surprise he ordered a perfect 180-degree turn and fled.

Then the strangest part occurred: After a few minutes Scheer made his only real mistake and performed another 180-degree turn to come right back towards the British. Even after the war Scheer could not explain why he did this; he might have hoped to cross behind the British T but in reality he now sailed straight towards the whole British fleet, 28 battleships in perfect line. To make matters worse the Germans were framed against the setting sun and could easily be seen yet could not see the British properly. Every British ship started to fire. A second chance for Trafalgar appeared. After 10 minutes of effectively unanswerable firing with his leading battlecruisers and battleships being hit repeatedly Scheer performed his master stoke. He ordered the battlecruisers (most hardly able to fire and slowly sinking) to charge the British and also ordered the destroyers, which had been having their own equally confused and indecisive battle, to charge the British and launch torpedoes. Both the battlecruisers and destroyers suffered massive fire. No torpedoes hit: however, that was because the British turned away from the torpedoes increasing the range and making a smaller end on target. This gave the Germans time to escape. Jellicoe hoped to catch them later but the Germans got back to base apart from the battlecruiser SMS Lutzow and the old battleship SMS Pommern.

The debate about who won began shortly afterwards: the Germans had sunk three major British warships for 1 of their own and due to the British ships exploding the British lost many more men (6095 vs 2551). However, all the German battlecruisers were heavily damaged, some hardly still afloat and the leading German battleships had also been massively damaged especially by the Queen Elizabeths. The British were able to fix their damaged ships more quickly and had not even had all their ships present. Warspite for example was taken into dock to be repaired and hew sister ship HMS Queen Elizabeth was simply sailed out of dock.

The German battlecruisers had defeated the British ones and the German admirals had out thought the British (especially Beattie). Scheer, however, only once brought his fleet out again and never seriously challenged the British after Jutland. He also advised the Kaiser that he thought a surface fleet naval victory impossible and pushed for unlimited submarine warfare: a decision that directly led to the USA entering the war. The British were left in command of the North Sea and continued the blockade of Germany.

There was much criticism of Jellicoe for having turned away from the torpedoes. Had he turned towards them he would almost certainly have destroyed all the German battlecruisers and quite possibly the battleships as well. He was not to know, however that relatively few torpedoes had been fired and might still have lost ships. Beattie, always the more popular admiral was lauded for his heroism although the professional naval observers supported Jellicoe’s actions. Also had the German fleet been sent to the bottom of the North Sea it would have had relatively little material effect on the war whereas had the Grand Fleet been destroyed the British would almost certainly have had to sue for peace. Hence, caution was probably the wisest option for Jellicoe: as Churchill (no fan of Jellicoe) once said Jellicoe was “the only man who could lose the war in an afternoon.”

Possibly the best way to describe the battle was that the Germans had done as well as they could have expected and the British as badly as might have been expected yet although the Germans won a marginal tactical victory the British won a moderate strategic victory. What remains of course is that many British and German sailors died and nothing material changed. One of the most famous quotes on the issue, which summed it up well is “The German navy assaulted its gaoler but was still in gaol.” It does make one wonder if something better could have been done with the millions expended on warships but then again that is always the way of wars.

  • Garibaldy

    Cheers Turgon. Nice to see the details filled in, and explained so clearly. I wonder if you know if it is regarded as significant in terms of the continuing blockade, given that the suffering of the German civilian population is often given as the explanation for the surrender of 1918 (and allowed Hitler et al to argue the army had been stabbed in the back)?

  • HeadTheBall


    Thank you for an interesting and incisive summary.

    Not strictly on topic, and despite the great difference in the scale of the two actions, I think of Jutland as analogous in outcome to the WW2 battle of the Coral Sea, which was of enormous importance here in Australia. Against a combined American/Australian naval force the Japanese scored a narrow tactical victory, taking out a US cruiser for the loss only of a light cruiser on their side, but the battle put paid, for the rest of the war, to any prospect of a Japanese seaborne assault on Australia, leading to their heavy involvement in New Guinea, their first defeat on land at Milne Bay and to the bitter fighting on the Kokoda Track, so iconic now in the Aussie consciousness.




    Can I save you a lot of time and writing here? I am from that tribe which the school & employment forms term as ‘being perceived from the Roman Catholic Community’. My family has a LONG seafaring tradition in BOTH the ROYAL NAVY & MERCHANT NAVY with my great grandfather, grandfather, father and great uncles serving in the two. My mother’s family have lived in Belfast Sailortown from the mid 1800’s so I have been regaled from a young age of stories & tales of the SEVEN seas.
    Jutland, off the coast of Denmark? The Germans knew that the British Grand Fleet was superior in numbers & firepower but Kaiser Wilhelm was determined to engage them in at least ONE major battle for German moral if nothing else. Jutland was that chance. The British patrolled the North Sea for months hoping to draw the Germans into a battle that would destroy the German fleet once and for all. A smaller flotilla of British destroyers broke off from the Grand Fleet and headed towards the Jutland peninsula in order to flush out the German Navy and nullify them. The Germans took the bait and engaged the British ships. Better guns and more accurate firepower ensured that The Germans sank and destroyed more ships than the British AND killed more sailors. The Germans KNEW however that in the long run they should cut their own losses and run because greater British numbers eventually would have overwhelmed them. The head of the Royal Navy Jellicoe panicked, his bottle went and despite holding ALL the aces he didn’t pursue the retreating Germans who escaped in a fog bank. It was seen as a major act of cowardice & shame by many Britons and Jellicoe’s name was mud from then on in. There is NO DOUBT that as a stand alone battle the Germans won it hands down in the same way that the RAF won the Battle of Britain despite the Germans having more planes and pilots.

  • Harry Flashman

    Churchill could be quite contemptuous of the Royal Navy at times (“rum, sodomy and the lash” and all that) but he was right about one vital point; the purpose of a navy is not to preserve its ships but to use those ships in pursuit of a strategic objective, if ships are lost along the way then so be it.

    Thus at the Dardanelles he never forgave the Navy for cutting and running when faced with losing some superannuated ships to mines leaving the poor bloody infantry to force the straits with disastrous consequences.

    Just as in a boxing match it is irrelevant how many heavy punches your opponent might land, if he eventually throws in the towel you are the winner, so it is with Jutland; the Brits suffered grievous losses but the Germans were forced to retreat back to harbour leaving the Royal Navy holding the ring. The German navy was to rust impotently for the rest of the war with their crews in latent mutiny before being sailed to rest under the guns of Scapa Flow where their hulks still litter the sea bottom.

    The British won the Battle of Jutland.

  • KieranJ

    Never mind Jutland, how about Dunkirk?

  • Turgon


    Certainly many professional historians produce the analysis that the blockade had an enormous effect and was indeed a major reason for the end of the war.

    I am no expert but I do wonder about such an analysis. It is the simple fact that Germany is a very large country with at the time a population per area lower than many other European countries and a fair number of natural resources. Also of course she was allied to Austro Hungary and by the end of the war had a neutral Russia. As such a naval blockade might not have been expected to create that much hardship. Certainly it was not as disastrous as the U boats would have been for Britain in both wars but the British blockade may well have been very significant over time.

    Sorry a not one way nor the other answer.

  • DavidD

    Thank you for that fair and concise summary, Turgon. The result was certainly a draw; the British blockade continued but Germany retained a ‘fleet in being’ as an ongoing threat.

    The German decision to build a High Seas fleet was a tragic mistake. It alienated Britain which had not previously been hostile without being strong enough to exert a decisive influence when war came. By the time of Jutland all the German overseas possessions except East Africa had been lost so even in peripheral areas the fleet had proved worthless.

  • Garibaldy

    Thanks for the extra info Turgon. I guess the extent to which the German people were put upon depended on to what they were used to. Maybe they felt they had had enough even though they were not starving. It’s an interesting one. Morale collapse different than the situation in WWII.