If the answer is yes..

The recent outages [hopefully soon to be resolved – Ed] have resulted in a few missed posts. On Tuesday Secretary of State for Wales etc, Peter Hain met the Irish Minister for foreign Affairs Dermot Ahern and issued another statement on the timetable, as reported by the BBC.

We are awaiting the results of the parties’ consultations and we expect them to come back and say they support the St Andrews Agreement by the 10 November.[added emphasis]

“If the answer is yes, then we will prepare the necessary legislation for introduction to parliament in the week starting 20 November.

“If the answer is no, then the parties all know the consequences, which is that the assembly will be dissolved for who knows how many years to come.”

While I’ve outlined just what it is that the parties will be agreeing to previously [link will appear when we get back to Kansas – Ed], here’s a quick reminder[pdf file]

6. We believe that the essential elements of support for law and order include endorsing fully the Police Service of Northern Ireland and the criminal justice system, actively encouraging everyone in the community to co-operate fully with the PSNI in tackling crime in all areas and actively supporting all the policing and criminal justice institutions, including the Policing Board.[added emphasis]

And, just in case anyone is in any doubt about that, the Joint Communiqué from the British-Irish Intergovernmental Conference repeated that same point

Political Developments

The two Governments paid tribute to the work of the political parties at St. Andrews and welcomed the major progress made to clear the way to restoration of the power-sharing institutions. They reiterated their belief that all parties should be able to endorse the St. Andrews Agreement and to implement it in good faith, building the trust and confidence necessary for a stable and lasting settlement. They also restated their position, as set out at St. Andrews, that support for policing and the rule of law should be extended to every part of the community; and that such support includes endorsing the Police Service of Northern Ireland and the criminal justice system, encouraging the community to co-operate with the police in tackling crime, and actively supporting all the policing and criminal justice institutions, including the Policing Board.[added emphasis]

10th November.. [can you hear a ticking sound? – Ed]


Discover more from Slugger O'Toole

Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated. 

2 thoughts on “If the answer is yes..”

  1. “actively encouraging everyone in the community to co-operate fully with the PSNI in tackling crime in all areas and actively supporting all the policing and criminal justice institutions, including the Policing Board”

    does this apply to the British government and it agencies. Will they “co-operate fully” in investigations into state collusion with loyalist death squads. How about a public inquiry (under the old rules) into the murder of pat finucane.

  2. “does this apply to the British government” – No, the St Andrew’s agreement is about Northern Ireland politicians reaching an agreement to jointly govern the place so that the British & Irish Governments don’t have to. Collusion and all the other things that went on in the past will have to be addressed separately.

    If you mean that there should be no devolved government without all the stuff of the past being dug up first then there will never be a devolved government as there is too much and so many people are dead or else won’t speak.

    DK

Comments are closed.