Farren: fulfil your obligations, then jump…

This is one of several keynote presentations made by politicians at Glencree Centre for Reconciliation‘s Summer School over the last weekend. Sean Farren re-iterates the centrality of the Belfast Agreement, and argues that the blame for vacuum lies squarely at the feet of paramilitaries. The hiatus has claimed lives and distracted politicians attention from key issues like reflating the local economy.By Sean Farren

The greatest political challenge for all of us in public life in the North is to recover the vision and the sense of hope that the Good Friday Agreement generated right across the communities North and South. More importantly we need to imbue the political process with a fresh generosity of spirit that will facilitate more positive relationships and without which our political institutions will find it difficult to function and the poison of sectarianism will not be drawn.

The GFA has provided the means whereby we can begin leaving the past behind and a better future carved out for all by local representatives working together. The agreement’s constitutional, institutional, policing, justice and human rights provisions are of a very robust kind. It was not any fundamental weaknesses in the agreement itself that brought suspension about but a failure to live up to commitments, especially those on decommissioning that caused a crisis of confidence between the parties

But after such a prolonged suspension of the institutions created by the GFA the sense of hope and the spirit of generosity it generated have been virtually sucked out of the political process. Consequently sectarianism remains alive and well and is now feeding racist attitudes in the North.

Several factors have contributed to this situation. But the provisional republican movement’s failure for so long to deliver on decommissioning was undoubtedly one of the most damaging. Its claims that decommissioning was a red herring, that decommissioning wouldn’t happen while at the same time conducting an extensive criminal campaign that climaxed in the Northern Bank robbery served only to strengthen those unionists opposed to the Agreement and weakened support for those who remained committed to it.

Loyalist paramilitaries who never felt bound by the GFA took full advantage of this situation to persist in their criminal activities, in their vendettas and in their attacks on the Catholic community.

I have no hesitation in saying that the paramilitaries, especially the IRA who, ironically, loudly proclaim that their aim is to unite Catholic, Protestant and Dissenter, carry the most blame for the prolonged suspension which envelopes the process. Add to that the indulgence afforded paramilitaries and their political backers by both governments – no sanctions for their prevarication and procrastination.

Instead both governments have offered further attempts to buy them off with such foolish proposals as those for community restorative justice and for dealing with the so-called ‘on-the-runs’. The first would have created a justice system paralleling the official system and so would have perpetuated paramilitary control of local communities. The second would have seen those alleged to have committed crime avoid even the most minimum judicial process.

It’s not difficult, therefore, to understand the sense of cynicism that now informs attitudes to the political process in the North.

At last the approach that ignored the truth and that however well intentioned its motives has by concentrating exclusively on the so-called problem parties, effectively rewarded those who bear the greatest responsibility for the paralysis that has passed for politics in the North, is now being abandoned.

In its place a new approach is being tried, one that the SDLP has longed since championed. That approach is the obvious one of involving all of the parties with a mandate. So, for the past few weeks and for the very first time in the history of conflict resolution in the North those parties have been meeting to address and try to resolve their outstanding differences.

So if we’re not to go down in history as the politicians who spurned the best means ever to build a new Ireland, to create harmonious relations between Orange and Green within the North and across Ireland as a whole, we need to openly and honestly grasp the opportunity we now have to restore the GFA, an opportunity which will only last until the 24 November.

Current discussions in the PfG committee have after a bad start got down to work at least in a business like way and with less of the acrimony between SF and the DUP that characterised that start.

But whether or not all the issues will be resolved in a manner that will make restoration possible is difficult to say. Even if all of the practical issues to do with how the Assembly, the NSMC, the BIC etc are to work, and what the arrangements should be for the administration of policing and justice, the Bill of Rights etc., the key issue is whether the DUP will see it to be in their interest to agree to enter and lead an administration with SF. It is part of the challenge we face that we convince the DUP that it is in their interest and indeed in the interest of all of the people of Northern Ireland that they do so.

Practically this means creating confidence between all of the parties that the following commitments are being honoured –

that partnership will be exercised in a genuine spirit of cooperation, not in one that seeks to constrain developments whether within the North, between North and South or between East and West;

that paramilitarism has clearly been abandoned and that exclusively democratic means will be used in order to promote political causes;

that policing and justice systems have the full endorsement of all political parties.

The days when any party should have to move to meet its commitments before others have moved to meet theirs are over. There is no possibility of that ever happening again. So we all need to pledge to meet our commitments together and so create the mutual confidence essential to sustaining the political institutions.

Should all of that happen then we can move very quickly to re-establish the institutions, to complete arrangements for the devolution of justice and policing and then set about tackling the day-to-day social and economic challenges that politicians in and out of government everywhere are in business to do.

In the North the challenge is to develop a more dynamic economy that moves us to a better balance between wealth creation and wealth consumption (we consume much more wealth than we produce by a factor of approx 50%); to fast forward infrastructural investment; to develop programmes to more effectively tackle social disadvantage. And above all to tackle the sectarianism that continues to poison relationships in our society; that takes the lives of young teenagers like Michael McIlveen and many, many others and that constructs so-called peace walls and creates no-go areas in our cities, twins and villages.

Those who would be responsible for us not being able to move to this position would rightly earn the very strong condemnation of this and succeeding generations. They would have betrayed the tremendous efforts that have been made by friends and supporters of a peaceful and democratic way forward. Such friends are here today, they have been with us throughout the past ten years, and they have come from here at home and from abroad. But above all it will be our own people whose hopes and expectations from what we could do together who will have been betrayed.

, , , ,

  • reg

    The problem Sean has is that people don’t vote for his party any more because the party doesn’t exist on the ground.

    How can the SDLP really know whats going on when they have no connection to the people?

    When you have to hire and pay a private company to wrap doors, put up posters and act as election agents you are in trouble.

    Playing to the audience Sean.

  • “distracted politicians attention from key issues like reflating the local economy.”

    Mmm – where inflating the local economy lies in the scheme of things was well illustrated today.

  • Harry

    As far as I can see there’s not a single word in that speech about the fact the british are the main power in northern ireland; that it is they who arm unionism and have insisted on disarming nationalism and that it is their actions which were central to collapsing the working structures of the agreement.

    According to this, only nasty working class people and some sectarian-minded unionists are responsible for the state of northern ireland. [Removed]

  • aquifer

    “the british .. insisted on disarming nationalism”

    No. The provisionals agreed to disarm in return for a political agreement with their countrymen.

    Prod paramilitaries don’t enjoy widespread support in the protestant community, and would quickly lose it if they attacked police and army working to disarm them. With an agreement in November they are time expired.

    A few more Sean Farrens and this place would be sorted.

  • ALan

    “And above all to tackle the sectarianism that continues to poison relationships in our society; that takes the lives of young teenagers like Michael McIlveen and many, many others and that constructs so-called peace walls and creates no-go areas in our cities, twins and villages.”

    Then leave behind sectarian designation which only rewards extremism as the SDLP know to their cost.

  • T.Ruth

    Let’s amend those aspects of the GFA that were repugnant to democrats-unaccountable Ministers;Unnacountable NS bodies;Executive members with links to terrorism and criminality;the D’Hondt system etc.Lets retain the vision embedded in its underlying principles-no terrorists in government and a commitment to Peace and Reconciliation.
    Let’s develop a shared vision for the future of Northern Ireland that is inclusive also of the views of the majority community and move forward with an Assembly that is open to all and an Executive that can immediately exclude any party which reneges on its obligations without a simultaneous collapse of the Institutions of Government.
    Sean Farren and Alistair MCDonnell and the SDLP have the confidence to promote their political view without the support of a private army and a criminal financial support network.They do this in the face of great pressure exerted on them by those who fear the democratic process.
    Unionists have no problem in sharing power and responsibility for government with others who are committed to democracy and the Rule of Law.
    T.Ruth.

  • kensei

    So to sum Mr Ruth then – no SF, majority rule, SDLP for window dressing.

    Well, I’m sold, anyway.

  • lib2016

    kensei,

    You omitted ‘no referendum’. That’s the bit which really sums up unionist committment to democracy.

  • brendan,belfast

    Reg said
    “When you have to hire and pay a private company to wrap doors, put up posters and act as election agents you are in trouble”

    Wrapping doors with what – big sheets of paper, election posters? that probably would require a private company.

    Politicans should definitely rap their own doors though.

  • T.Ruth

    Kensei
    I have no problem with SF or any other mandated party being in the Assembly. To have a place of right in the Executive level of government it would be reasonable however to expect that all parties could extricate themselves from any connection with terrorism and criminality.
    Lib.
    I would welcome a referendum particularly if the result would be respected and we could then set aside unproductive politics about a united Ireland for an agreed period of time while local politicians work together on the problems that affect us all.
    T.Ruth

  • Reg-

    people don’t vote for his party any more because the party doesn’t exist on the ground.”

    Right, so the SDLP was just handed 18 Assembly seats and 3 Westminster seats without having to get any votes? Grow up! The SDLP may be behind SF at the minute in terms of votes- is that supposed to mean that they aren’t entitled in express their opinion?! So much for freedom of speech. The SDLP has a considerable mandate, and it is fully entitled to act on that mandate, despite your attempts to claim it should do otherwise.

    As regards not being on the ground- ok, so those doors I knock or those newsletters I deliver don’t exist- they are merely a figment of my imaginiation? Perhaps I ought to seek medical attention if this is the case, cos I could’ve sworn the SDLP is out and about on a regular basis. And perhaps you should ask the constituency office personnel who help hundreds of people each week across the north whether they feel detached from their communties.