Not such an historic snapshot in time after all?

Three weeks ago, when charges of membership of paramilitary groups, the UDA and the UFF, were dropped against Ihab Shoukri, Judge Thomas Burgess commented that when deciding what evidence to put forward, the prosecution “may have to consider wider issues than those before the court.” Since then there has been an attempt to expel the Shoukri brothers from the UDA, which prompted this response, and now, according to the BBC, Ihab Shoukri is to appear in court on “terrorist offences” tomorrow.. the best laid plans o’ mice an’ men..?

Discover more from Slugger O'Toole

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.