Unionist rapprochement in the offing?

There appears to be a distinct moderation in both the tone and substance of Martin Smyth’s latest statement to the Newsletter this morning.

Pointing out that he was one of the very first senior Unionists to publicly advocate early discussions with Sinn Fein, he went on to suggest that:

…in the debate since 1998 all critics have been labelled as ‘hardliners’, ‘dissidents’ or ‘rebels’ by the media and others. The difference between being anti-Belfast Agreement, which most unionists are, and being anti-agreement, which I believe most unionists are not, has been overlooked all too often. If the leadership moves from the line that only the will of the 54 per cent matters, we can move forward. But there must be realism that one side alone backing down will not resolve this dispute.


Discover more from Slugger O'Toole

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.