Slugger O'Toole

Conversation, politics and stray insights

NI Justice Minister: “I trust that the executive will recognise that it is the right decision, and that I was right to make it”

Fri 31 January 2014, 4:46pm

In the aftermath of the Northern Ireland First and deputy First Ministers/Executive/Assembly/Policing Board members semi-detached polit-bureau’s kerfuffle over the NI Justice Minister’s proposed changes to the criteria for the next Chief Constable, Liam Clarke reveals some significant correspondence on the matter.  Firstly, the Chief Executive of the NI Policing Board, Sam Pollock, tries his hand at herding cats to put some manners on members of the Board.

In his letter to Policing Board members, Mr Pollock wrote: “I am disappointed in the fact that board members, in my view, have been commenting inappropriately and in a way that damages their independence and objectivity should such members be engaged in a few weeks’ time in appointment processes based on absolute fairness and impartiality.”

He added: “Following the decision of the Chief Constable to announce his departure, media commentary and speculation is potentially damaging, and is impacting on the confidence and integrity of the board as a public body in fulfilling its statutory duties.”

He made clear that, contrary to suggestions, the process of replacing Mr Baggott was not yet under way and the criteria for his replacement had not been settled.

He wrote: “The appointments processes for Chief Constable and the Deputy Chief Constable will be initiated next week but appointment panels, criteria and arrangements for the competition will only be approved at the March board. The board is the public authority which will initiate, manage and oversee the appointments processes.” [added emphasis throughout]

He added that “it is my sincere hope that board members, regardless of whether they are political or independent members, will respect the governance of the board and will do nothing or say nothing that would undermine or jeopardise the impartiality and objectivity of the board in its significant responsibilities.”

And, contrary to comments without, and within, the NI Assembly [see topical questions],

In an email to PSNI staff and officers on Wednesday, [Deputy Chief Constable Judith Gillespie] wrote: “I notified the Policing Board of my intention to retire before Christmas. This was a decision I made in quiet reflection over many months, considering a wide range of factors. In making this decision I was fully aware that a consultation process was already under way by the Justice Minister regarding the criteria for Chief Constable of PSNI.” [added emphasis]

Finally,

Mr Ford was also criticised for taking a decision without consulting the justice committee.

But it emerged in a separate document that Mr Ford contacted the committee, but had “no response from any party to provide formal feedback either on the criteria or consultation process”.

As the BBC reports, following the Northern Ireland Executive meeting on Thursday,

Ministers discussed the matter on Thursday, when they agreed Mr Ford would consult on his proposal.

After the meeting, Mr Ford said he had not interfered in the role of the Policing Board but “enhanced it”.

He said he had “tackled an issue of potential inequality, on the advice of the Equality Commission”, and had “consulted deeper and wider than I was required to do”.

“[I will now continue down the road that I have embarked on.] For whatever reasons, and I fear they are only political reasons, the DUP and Sinn Féin have determined that I must bring my final decision to the executive for it to consider – I will do so,” he said. [added emphasis]

“But I trust that the executive will recognise that it is the right decision, and that I was right to make it.

“The executive must ensure that it does not allow politics to be dragged into the recruitment of a chief constable, nor the role of a justice minister.”

In a separate Belfast Telegraph report, Liam Clarke clarifies the situation

Mr Baggott has said he wants to retire, and must go by September. Under current rules candidates for his job are required to have served two years at Assistant Chief Constable level or above in an outside force. Mr Ford proposes reducing this from an absolute requirement to something which is “desirable”.

This would bring the PSNI into line with practice elsewhere in the UK. The Justice Minister proposes making it mandatory that the successful candidate should have completed the Strategic Command Course at Bramshill, or equivalent.

Equivalent courses include the FBI Executive course for future chiefs of police, which has been completed by some senior gardai.

It remains a moot point whether Mr Ford accepts that the Executive has a right to overrule him. A paper he submitted to the Executive is understood to have insisted that “this decision is within his powers as Minister of Justice” and pointed out that he had, so far, only issued it in draft form as part of a consultation process.

The First Ministers have the power to intervene in ministerial decisions if they are “significant and controversial”. Mr Ford argued: “This decision does not deal with significant matters, but involves only minor adjustment to the mandatory minimum criteria for an appointment process.”

And he is “not prohibiting the [NI Policing] Board from adding to these minimum criteria…

Share 'NI Justice Minister: “I trust that the executive will recognise that it is the right decision, and that I was right to make it”' on Delicious Share 'NI Justice Minister: “I trust that the executive will recognise that it is the right decision, and that I was right to make it”' on Digg Share 'NI Justice Minister: “I trust that the executive will recognise that it is the right decision, and that I was right to make it”' on Facebook Share 'NI Justice Minister: “I trust that the executive will recognise that it is the right decision, and that I was right to make it”' on Google+ Share 'NI Justice Minister: “I trust that the executive will recognise that it is the right decision, and that I was right to make it”' on LinkedIn Share 'NI Justice Minister: “I trust that the executive will recognise that it is the right decision, and that I was right to make it”' on Pinterest Share 'NI Justice Minister: “I trust that the executive will recognise that it is the right decision, and that I was right to make it”' on reddit Share 'NI Justice Minister: “I trust that the executive will recognise that it is the right decision, and that I was right to make it”' on StumbleUpon Share 'NI Justice Minister: “I trust that the executive will recognise that it is the right decision, and that I was right to make it”' on Twitter Share 'NI Justice Minister: “I trust that the executive will recognise that it is the right decision, and that I was right to make it”' on Add to Bookmarks Share 'NI Justice Minister: “I trust that the executive will recognise that it is the right decision, and that I was right to make it”' on Email Share 'NI Justice Minister: “I trust that the executive will recognise that it is the right decision, and that I was right to make it”' on Print Friendly

Comments (11)

  1. sherdy (profile) says:

    David Ford has been aware for months that the CC and DCC were leaving their posts and had he made his ‘decision’ before the official ‘retirement’ announcements were made, I don’t think there would have been such a hullabaloo.
    But once the competition was started it was not the time to change the rules. It opens the door to suspicion over his motives.

    What do you think?
    (Log in or register to judge or mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  2. cynic2 (profile) says:

    Ford has been caught out again.

    So now he believed this was so important that he needed o act – but not before the DCC was out of the game. One might think that someone in Justice wanted to engineer that situation but that would be a real breach of equality and, of course, would never happen

    Sent off like a little political; boy to consult the big boys and return when they will tell him what hes going to do

    And all of this is self inflicted

    Just like the Flegs

    What is the Alliance Party for?

    What do you think?
    (Log in or register to judge or mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  3. Pete Baker (profile) says:

    Sherdy

    “But once the competition was started it was not the time to change the rules”

    Read the quotes from the Policing Board Chief Executive again.

    The ‘competition’ has not started yet.

    What do you think?
    (Log in or register to judge or mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  4. Seamuscamp (profile) says:

    Pete Baker

    “The ‘competition’ has not started yet.” Hasn’t it?

    “Mr Ford argued: “This decision does not deal with significant matters, but involves only minor adjustment to the mandatory minimum criteria for an appointment process.””
    The rules were changed in England in line with the Tories wish to throw open senior police positions to competition from, for example, retired army officers and American policemen. For Mr Ford to pretend that it is a mere bagatelle shows that either he doesn’t understand the nature of political interference or he doesn’t read newspapers.

    If Mr Ford was eager to emphasise the discretion of the NIPB, he should have pointed out to the Board that it had discretion, rather than steering them in a particular direction.

    What do you think?
    (Log in or register to judge or mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  5. Pete Baker (profile) says:

    Seamuscamp

    “The ‘competition’ has not started yet.”

    Read the quotes from the Policing Board Chief Executive, again. As it were…

    “If Mr Ford was eager to emphasise the discretion of the NIPB, he should have pointed out to the Board that it had discretion”

    Try the “not prohibiting the Board from adding to these minimum criteria…

    What do you think?
    (Log in or register to judge or mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  6. Comrade Stalin (profile) says:

    sherdy,

    Reading your comment I remind myself that it is impossible to argue with a conspiracy theorist. Not matter what facts are presented, and no matter how the facts disprove whatever confused ideas there are afoot, you’ll not be dissuaded from seeing whatever it is you want to see.

    What do you think?
    (Log in or register to judge or mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  7. DC (profile) says:

    According to Willie Frazer – the Alliance Party is rotten to the core – to the core!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2ZVLCFdbmk#t=99

    What do you think?
    (Log in or register to judge or mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  8. DC (profile) says:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2ZVLCFdbmk#t=71

    What do you think?
    (Log in or register to judge or mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  9. sherdy (profile) says:

    CS, – Does that make my contention wrong? No, I don’t think so.
    DC, – ‘According to Willie Frazer’. I consider Willie to be a poor unfortunate who should be sheltered from the big bad world. But the idea of you using him as your Bible – does that put you into the same category?

    What do you think?
    (Log in or register to judge or mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  10. Comrade Stalin (profile) says:

    Sherdy, you haven’t specified a real contention, only implied that Ford has some sort of a motive. The lack of evidence for any specific motive is where the issue lies.

    What do you think?
    (Log in or register to judge or mark as offensive)
    Commend 0
  11. cynic2 (profile) says:

    Stalin

    Lack of motive
    Lack of gumption
    Lack of sense

    …the list goes on and on

    What do you think?
    (Log in or register to judge or mark as offensive)
    Commend 0

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Copyright © 2003 - 2014 Slugger O'Toole Ltd. All rights reserved.
Powered by WordPress; produced by Puffbox.
70 queries. 0.536 seconds.