Don’t play the Orange card folks, it’s a joker

Did Owen Paterson realise what a can of worms he was opening when he got that historic opponent of the Republic’s involvement in the north, the wily Robert Gascoyne-Cecil, Marquess of Salisbury to facilitate talks with the unionist parties – assuming Salisbury (or Cranborne as we knew him better) didn’t get there first? The very name throbs with significance, as its Victorian bearer the Prime Minister was the great opponent of Home Rule. The only half-tangible result so far has been a threat to the bipartisanship between the two main parties three months before the general election, a consummation devoutly not to be wished. The Conservatives’ bungled Hatfield House initiative, whatever it was, was bound to prompt nationalist charges of breaking the bipartisan approach. Labour’s reply given to Nick Watt the Guardian lobby correspondent who assiduously covers Sinn Fein’s occasional sallies to Westminster, simply deepens the problem.

One senior government source said: “We are simply astonished at what the Tories are doing. The Northern Ireland peace process has been strengthened by the bipartisan approach between all the major parties at Westminster. Holding talks at a country estate – and excluding the nationalists – is absolutely not within that spirit

The Hatfield “mystery” has been picked up by the BBC’s political editor Nick Robinson, on the possible significance of an unionist electoral pact which could also benefit the Conservatives in a hung Parliament, however much the Tories deny the latter was a Hatfield theme. There is a glimmer here of Northern Ireland emerging an election issue between the two main UK parties, especially if the present Executive collapses. It will nobody any good in NI.
The problem would be compounded if elections for Stormont as well as Westminster were held on the same day, as is being rumoured as a possibility.


Discover more from Slugger O'Toole

Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.

Categories Uncategorised

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.