Cowardly attacks on female politicians’ appearance not just the work of social media’s losers

DUP MLA Carla Lockhart has today rightly highlighted the unacceptable nature of personal abuse that was directed at her on social media recently.

Comments were directed at her and party leader, Arlene Foster, after the latter had posted a photograph of the pair on Twitter.

Lockhart’s intervention was welcomed by Sinn Fein’s Northern Leader, Michelle O’Neill:

The personal abuse meted out to high profile figures in politics can be deeply unsavoury, and is usually attributed to accounts with anonymous profiles behind which individuals hide to avoid being directly linked with cowardly comments that can be misogynistic, racist, homophobic or sectarian in nature.

Lockhart is correct to raise this issue.

It is equally important to call out the actions of elected representatives and commentators who resort to similar language on screen or on social media to denigrate political opponents using looks or appearance as a weapon.

A number of years ago, Carla and Arlene’s party colleague, Sammy Wilson, made this comment about two female elected representatives:

“The other two Sinn Fein ministers are two women. I can’t remember their names but their sister’s called Cinderella.”

There is only one way to interpret Wilson’s words. He has form in this regard.

Coming from a prominent elected representative, the significance of Wilson’s utterances to a party gathering would have a considerably greater impact on account of his status as an influential, high profile figure.

If Carla Lockhart speaking out makes a difference to the conduct of some people on Twitter, then it will be a positive step, and she is to be commended for raising her voice on this matter. But let’s hold our elected representatives and other prominent figures to (at least) the same standard we expect of faceless cowards on Twitter.


Discover more from Slugger O'Toole

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.