With little of substance separating SF and the DUP, a war over manners stands proxy for NI politics…

Interesting editorial in the Irish Times musing on the subject of Sinn Fein’s true intentions re the restart of institutions, and concluding that:

Although the DUP is showing signs of a willingness to engage, the noises coming from Sinn Féin are less positive and there are doubts about the party’s real intentions. One widely held view is that it has given up on wanting to exercise power in the North on the basis that it is damaging its strategy of building support in the Republic. The party has certainly been stung by accusations from its opponents in the Dáil that it is willing to implement policies in the North that it vehemently opposes south of the border.

One way of putting an end to such taunts would be to avoid going back to power sharing. That would trigger direct rule from Westminster and would allow the party to adopt a populist anti-government strategy on both sides of the border. The other side of the coin, though, is that if it shows itself incapable of exercising power in Northern Ireland, Sinn Féin’s credibility as a potential party of government in the Republic will suffer.

The former is where the instinct of its interminably secure leadership group lies. Contact with government responsibility has done it no direct harm in Northern Ireland (particularly when compared directly with the DUP), but nor has it been particularly able to prosper by it.

The collapse was precipitated by a base unhappy with its record in government. Perhaps that’s been satiated by the spilling of unionist blood at the polls. But as the Times editorial points out, there’s little to be negotiated that have “not already been covered in the Stormont House and Fresh Start agreements”.

But as the Times editorial points out, there’s little left to be negotiated which has “not already been covered in the Stormont House and Fresh Start agreements”.

Perhaps this explains why the controversies currently blowing through the body politic centre on politically inconsequential matters such as the choice of words between the two women most likely to head the local institutions, should they restart in the next few months?

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.