An election would be an abuse of democracy. Knuckle down after the holiday and learn how to do modern politics.

Even with a fairer wind than we experienced since 1998 , it was always going to be difficult to reconcile  natural contention in politics with good cross community government. If all-party government worked well, the Assembly would have very little to do. If government failed, it would only amplify the differences. The select committees were supposed to supply critical scrutiny but  lacked skills and were too often the creatures of the dominant party.  In an Executive governing largely by rival party caucuses, genuine collective responsibility among the parties was very weak.  Agendas were withheld and there were cases in which a minister of one party took the minister of another to court. Delay and deadlock were endemic.

The party battle over identity politics was paramount. Power was too much about patronage, feeding charges of   cronyism and corruption, often if not always exaggerated. The skills required to transact government were neglected. These were the political conditions which gave birth to the RHI scheme, a scandal, not about identity politics or as far as one can tell, patronage; but dull old good government.

After the May election, the creation of a two party government combined with an opposition seemed to simplify matters.  For a couple of months since the May election it seemed as if a genuine Fresh Start was possible. If the signs were cautiously favourable in the Executive, old games were still being played out in the Assembly. The Daithi McKay / Jamie Bryson affair showed elements in both parties targeting the other’s leaderships. Sinn Fein were prepared to sacrifice the up and coming but over-partisan McKay.    But the legacy of distrust left behind may have been greater than many thought.

There was a surprising new phenomenon:  Sinn Fein in the Executive began to be criticised for letting the DUP roll over them. Personalities were partly blamed: Arlene Foster’s perceived arrogance and Martin McGuinness’s supposedly weakening grip.

Alleged DUP support for loyalist paramilitary residues  was  resented at a time when Sinn Fein were on the defensive over the Jock Davison/ Kevin McGuigan tit- for- tat IRA murders. It  was as if   the DUP were  consorting with paramilitaries just as Sinn Fein were being forced to give  them up.  The essential unity needed to carry forward  “the reintegration of former paramilitaries into society” was put under some strain. Sinn Fein’s programme of cultural recognition in the new councils and the Executive was more boldly dismissed than ever. Sinn Fein haven’t been placated by the DUP Communities minister’s enthusiasm for rebuilding the controversial Casement Park stadium.

In this situation they failed to earn credit for their forbearance even from impeccably democratic critics; nor did they deign to explain themselves. Is forbearance now over and have old instincts revived?

Although one can’t be entirely sure, the RHI scandal may be  becoming quite a serious political crisis, even managing to overshadow the deep challenges of Brexit. Despite that it has  a certain comedic quality. Sinn Fein’s on-off-on tactics are confusing and perhaps confused. They declined to bring the RHI scandal to a head this week only to threaten a new crisis on identical grounds next month. Arlene Foster has refused to follow precedents which richly benefited her own advance and stand down “ temporarily.”

If the DUP and Sinn Fein don’t come to some agreement  over the next few weeks  there probably  can’t be any sort of inquiry into the  RHI scheme.  It’s doubtful that the Attorney General has the power to convene one and anyway he’s hardly either party’s favourite. Under present circumstances it could also be very difficult to get the consent of a judge from across the water to chair it. If the terms of reference were anything like Sinn Fein’s abortive Assembly motion on Monday they’d be bound to draw in the whole system of government in which Sinn Fein is equally implicated.

I see only two solutions. One is for the DUP and Sinn Fein to agree the terms of an independent inquiry which leaves  allocating responsibility to the inquiry itself. This is hardly a doddle for Arlene Foster and it should well satisfy Sinn Fein.  The two ablest minsters, Mairtin O Muilleoir of  Sinn Fein and Simon Hamilton of the DUP, can then present  whatever evidence and solutions they have to the inquiry  rather than drip-feeding the media.  (Arguably though the solutions are a separate process).

The other approach is an election which would only inflame passions pointlessly and put solutions on hold. In normal democracies elections give voters the opportunity to “ throw the bastards out.” But this is no more likely in Stormont today as it was under communism or fascism – and won’t be, until or unless the opposition develop as a credible  alternative coalition and the identity designations are  replaced by a weighted majority. In the meantime the imminence of Brexit with perhaps more powers heading for Stormont is no time to  mess about so carelessly.

I take the view that the institutions came out of Monday turbulence pretty well in the circumstances. Everyone had the say they wanted. There was even parity of dissatisfaction with those circumstances. They should resist the tendency to move  from furious pedantry about procedure to bringing the whole  house down in a single leap. If a sacrificial lamb is really needed, the Speaker who did his best might feel he has taken enough from  both a government  and an opposition party. The young Assembly is developing untidily as  all parliaments do; even after 1000 years, Westminster is changing behind the flummery.

So in one sense the politicians shouldn’t be so hard on themselves and each other. On the other hand, there should carefully reflect over Christmas on the consequences if this latest exercise of brinkmanship tips them over the edge. Believe it n or not, some commentators seem exhilarated at the possibility of collapse and get high  on the prospect of another sham fight so soon after the last one. But politics is more than a game. They should get their kicks another way, like the excellent Alex Kane.

Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger.

While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.