The bill is a direct consequence of the failure to independently deal with the past in an inclusive and holistic way and as such should not be progressed in isolation to a wider process of inclusive truth recovery. Ideally this issue should be the opportunity to now convene meaningful and substantive discussions on how best we deal with the past.
It’s very hard to disagree with that statement. And indeed RFJ does a lot of important work not just campaigning but supporting for the victims of state violence. But the inconsistency Emerson notes here boils down to the depiction of activism though the legislature as somehow out of bounds of that holistic approach, and activism through the courts, the police ombudsman, the coroner, pressure for international intervention etc as firmly in.