Westminster Boundaries for Wales – best of a bad job?

Wales On-Line reveals the new Welsh Westminster boundaries, which cut the nation’s MPs from 40 to 30.

Such a radical cut obviously requires some bold swipes on the map. Here’s a PDF of the new constituencies.

The effect? – Currently the 40 MPS are split Labour 26, Tory 8, Lib Dem 3, Plaid 3.

Taking the easiest first and extrapolating 2010 results (without assuming any change in voting patterns) Plaid’s two Gwynedd seats are merged into 1 in the North and in the South the old Carmarthen seat is re-introduced (as Caerfyrddin) which would have gone Plaid in 2010.

For the Lib Dems – Ceredigion is expanded southwards into North Pembs. 2010 would have seen an easy Lib Dem win. Brecon and Radnor is pushed upwards into Montgomeryshire to create South Powys – again Lib Dem in 2010. Their third seat, Cardiff Central, is merged with the greater part of Cardiff South and Penarth – I think Labour would have taken this in 2010.

As for the Tories – one of their 2 Dyfed seats disappears as the new seat of South and West Pembs consolidates two Tory seats. In the North the three Tory seats of Aberconwy, Clwyd West and Montgomery disappear. The new North Wales Coast (what a dull, terrible name) would have been Tory – as I think would have been Glyndwr and North Powys (for which Plaid will, however, have some hopes next time) so two seats kept out of 3. In the South both enlarged Monmouthshire and the Vale of Glamorgan would have been safe in 2010. However the revised Cardiff North, including parts of Caerffili, would have been Labour.

So of the 30 seats we have Plaid 2(-1), Lib Dems 2(-1), Tories 5(-3)..so by elimination (I’ve done this the easy way ..) that leaves Labour on 21(-5).

Two decisions worth commenting on – the new Newport West and Sirhywi Valley includes the good sea-faring folk of Pontllanfraith and Ystrad Mynach – very strange – whilst the two seats of Blaenau Gwent and Heads of the Valleys have a socio-economic profile on a par with Belarus – I think that that concentration of deprivation isn’t very healthy.

Here’s the BBC’s report.

Discover more from Slugger O'Toole

Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.