Scottish Labour: “Minimum unit pricing was rightly rejected by MSPs because it is effectively a tax on the poor”

The UK’s coalition government has announced proposals to introduce minimum unit pricing on alcohol sold in England and Wales.  But with it being a devolved matter, Northern Ireland doesn’t have to follow.

Nevertheless, the NI Social Development Minister and the Health Minister have joined forces to announce their intention to launch a public consultation on the issue.  Although there is already a wrinkle evident

“I am meeting the Irish Minister for Justice and Law Reform Dermot Ahern in Dublin in the first week in February. Our discussions will include opportunities for minimum pricing on the island of Ireland given there is so much cross-border trade including purchase of alcohol.” [NI Social Development Minister, the SDLP’s Alex Attwood]

In Scotland, where concerns were raised about the legality of such minimum pricing, similar proposals have already been rejected

“Minimum unit pricing was rightly rejected by MSPs because it is effectively a tax on the poor,” the opposition Scottish Labour Party Health spokeswoman Jackie Baillie said in an e- mailed statement.

A point on which Brendan O’Neill would undoubtedly agree

As John Stuart Mill argued 150 years ago, any hike in the price of “stimulants” that is designed to make them less accessible represents an attack on individual liberty. He described moralistic price rises as a “sin tax”. “Every increase of cost is a prohibition, to those whose means [do] not come up to the augmented price”, he wrote. “To tax stimulants for the sole purpose of making them more difficult to be obtained is a measure differing only in degree from their entire prohibition, and would be justifiable only if that were justifiable.”

What we have in minimum alcohol pricing is a prohibition on the kind of boozing that Cameroons and Cleggites consider immoral: the cheap and speedy consumption of lots of drink with the aim of getting temporarily wasted. Such drinking might not be the high point of human civilisation, but it should not be punished and possibly even banned simply because it doesn’t conform to some political squares’ idea of what a proper night out is. This is prohibition through the backdoor, targeted at those whom the political classes consider to be reckless and self-destructive.

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.