Nats benefit from no seats at PM’s debate

One of the lesser delights of the TV election was last Monday’s comprehensive stuffing of Jeremy Paxman, not by some Westminster luminary but the unlikely figure of the Plaid Cymru’s economics guru the terrifyingly magisterial Eurfyl ap Gwilym, as noted by Alan Trench ( see his You Tube link).

There is a serious point in this, beyond preparation (or not). Paxman clearly seems to think that the ‘normal’ or ‘fair’ way of allocating public spending should be that everyone gets the same – equal per capita funding. He doesn’t appear even to understand the concept of allocation of funds according to relative need, let alone accept that principle.

The riveting exchanges which Newsnight has somehow failed to highlight were unfortunately timed examples of the occasional gaps in understanding between the metropolis and the devolved UK over big issues like political broadcasting and public finance. Simon Jenkins links the two subjects ingeniously by insisting that if the BBC had been able to give seats to the SNP and Plaid Cymru in the Prime Minister’s Debate, their greedy demands for more and more dosh would have been exposed to the appalled English.

Jenkins being pretty metropolitan himself probably hasn’t noticed the scale of consoling coverage awarded to the Celts in the UK national networks – not to mention the leaders’ debates and the avalanche of other coverage mounted in  both nations’ own BBC networks which Jenkins may never have heard of.

In spite of the failure of his legal challenge to exclusion, Alex Salmond looked pretty pleased with the outcome – and himself – in last night’s post-Debate Question Time.

No doubt the SNP and Plaid will go on to blame their absence from the PM’s Debate for the rise of the Lib Dems in Scotland and the Conservatives in Wales. There is an election on, after all.


Discover more from Slugger O'Toole

Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.