A way through deadlock over electoral reform?

Deadlock has been reached over the Lib Dem’s sine qua non, electoral reform.  Labour’s proposal for AV doesn’t fit the bill, as John Curtice spells out.

(The Lib Dems) might win up to twice as many seats – 217 – as they would under the current system… Yet it would be Labour, with 238 seats, that would still be the largest party. The Conservatives, meanwhile, would be a poor third with just 163 seats. 

AV+ which adds a second vote from a party list  might even up the balance. Bu the Lib Dems favourite, our own STV, is anathema to the Tories, reports  keen observer of the British political scene, Iain Martin of the Wall St Journal.

(Cameron) would definitely struggle to get a referendum ( on PR) past the parliamentary party. Colleagues are very worried,” said a senior back-bencher A prominent peer described conceding a referendum on PR as “the end” for his party and for Labour, too. This is a view shared by Labour opponents of PR.Another senior Tory predicted that Cameron would lose a referendum on PR.

The Constitution Unit, always willing to help in the interests of democracy, offers a way through

There may be the beginnings of a deal with the Tories, starting with a boundary review, and including electoral reform in the process.The Tories are already committed to such a review, because of their policy to reduce the size of the House of Commons to 585. You also have a commitment to reduce the Commons, to 500. So despite the rhetorical gap, a deal may be possible here – but it would take time to implement.