As Ive mentioned a few times here, were going to be giving Slugger quite a major upgrade soon. The work is now underway at last.n The good news is that it wont be falling over every time more than a few hundred of you want to look at it at the same time, or every time the server goes up the Swanney. The site will look a good deal better as well, and well have a shiny new comments system. Weve had advice from readers before on this, and we did a session at the Belfast PICamp on the subject, so here are our conclusions / instructions to the developers so far, along with a few questions.Firstly, you will be able to register as a commenter with the site but only if you want to. You can still create ad-hoc user-names or comment anonymously . Some of our best comments come this way and we dont want to lose them.
We wont hold any data about you on the site apart from your email address and whatever username you choose for yourself and youll always be able to edit your profile as a commenter.
If you want to, you can add things to your profile such as a Twitter feed, an RSS-feed to pick up articles from other sites (your own blog?), a fetching self-portrait, links to your Facebook profile, LinkedIn page and other good stuff like that. Youll have the option (opt-in) to register for Sluggers updates.
We will discourage impersonation though and unless your name actually is Martin McGuinness, well probably ask you to change your chosen username to avoid any confusion deliberate or otherwise.
If you do register, every comment you make will be archived against your commenter profile. Youll be able to keep track of what you say as will others.
Were going to give the option to comment in threads, though you will still have the option to comment in the linear way that you do now. Youll also be able to choose how you view comments.
Anyhow, here are our questions for you:
1. What do you think to this? We want the comments system to improve the quality of our comment thread both for you as readers, and as a benefit to the wider site. To this end, were going to allow readers to rank individual comments. One way would be a simple thumbs up / thumbs down option. Or we could have a slider between say conversational and argumentative. Or we could have a similar slider between evidence and opinion? Or one between original and repetition? Well have to tread a bit of a fine line here because we dont want to make it too easy for everyone to dismiss some comments – thereby discouraging commenters. We all post a duff comment every now and again….
2. How do we incentivise commenters to improve their commenting? We may put something on your profile that will accumulate any data from the above comments-ranking system. If you post a lot of comments that are appreciated by fellow commenters, maybe you can build up a reputation as a conversational commenter and your profile can get some kind of badge?. We *could* also have a troll badge for the more persistent below-the-belt merchants (you know who you are!)
3. How do we make Slugger more inclusive? We like the fact that Slugger is a bit robust, but one downside that weve picked up is that some potential commenters often people who may have something worthwhile to add choose not to say anything on our threads because theyre worried that theyll end up as troll-bait. Were thinking of asking everyone who reads a thread to give its conversational quality a ranking. Any thoughts?
4. Comment moderation: Though we’re keen to allow anonymous commenters, we’re thinking of pre-moderating them (but not pre-moderating well-established commenters) to discourage trollery and other undesireable behaviour. What
Lastly, were aiming to make the commenting system that we build available as an open source WordPress plug-in. This means that other blogs will be able to use it. Ideally, wed like to build this in such a way that you will be able to comment on those blogs and have your comments indexed on your profile here (and vice versa those blogs will also allow you to build up a profile there that can index the comments from here). Any comments on that?