“but it’s art, m’lud”

It might start off being a bit of fun, but.. And, speaking of artistic endeavours, at the Guardian’s Commentisfree blog Tim Footman has a modest proposal

Perhaps those who enter a plea of “but it’s art, m’lud” ought to be tried, not by a conventional judge and jury, but by a panel of critics and academics.

However, this must not be an easy option; these art courts would be able to impose sanctions as draconian as those available in the regular system. Bad art should be punished with the same ferocity as bad behaviour. Artists who elect to be tried on the merits or otherwise of their work might like to recall the fate of Cinna, in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar. Mistaken for his namesake, one of Caesar’s assassins, Cinna pleads that he is a mere poet; the mob’s verdict is to “tear him for his bad verses”.

And how wonderful it would be to have some ne’er-do-well windily claiming aesthetic justification for his latest outrage, only to find, peering out from beneath the judicial wig, the withering gaze of Brian Sewell.


Discover more from Slugger O'Toole

Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.